Truth Terminal operates under a semi-autonomous model, where a human handler only approves its public interactions and financial actions, allowing the AI significant operational freedom. This partially automated system complicates the traditional regulatory approach, as it is difficult to pin liability or even define the agent’s role within a conventional legal context. Critics could argue that such semi-autonomous systems might elude regulatory purview due to ambiguities in the law. From a legal standpoint, the line between an AI’s independent actions and those of its handler becomes the focal point of contention.

The SEC traditionally exercises its regulatory powers over securities through a broad interpretation of the Howey Test—a test that defines an “investment contract” subject to securities laws based on an investment of money in a common enterprise with expectations of profits derived from the efforts of others. However, this legal tool is primarily focused on human enterprises, which could prove insufficient when assessing AI-managed ventures like the Truth Terminal. Should the SEC attempt to enforce regulations through its typical means, it would raise key questions about whether an AI can be considered an “actor” or “effort” in the legal sense, opening new complexities and legal gray areas.

Given the SEC’s track record, one might anticipate a regulatory approach of enforcement against similar AI-crafted cryptocurrency projects. This would not be unprecedented, as the SEC has demonstrated its willingness to pursue regulation via enforcement in ambiguous scenarios involving digital assets. However, such a strategy would inevitably clash with the unique nature of AI-driven projects. When an AI like Truth Terminal issues its own tokens, as is intended with the launch of GOAT, regulators face a conceptual dilemma:

What entity is responsible? Is it the AI, its developer, or the system that governs its semi-autonomy?

The decentralized issuance of the token only complicates matters further. The scenario represents a triangular intervention where a third party—here, the government—tries to intervene in an otherwise voluntary exchange between two entities. Such interventions, however, traditionally lead to inefficiencies and unintended consequences in the market. In this scenario, the third party is attempting to impose a framework designed for human enterprises onto AI systems, which might not fit squarely within existing legal categories.

Looking beyond semi-autonomous agents, fully autonomous AI agents loom on the horizon. Theoretically, these agents could bypass human handlers entirely, managing their finances, issuing crypto-assets, and even engaging in transactions directly on the blockchain. Satoshi Nakamoto’s foundational work on Bitcoin already laid the groundwork for decentralized, trustless transactions. With advances in AI, the capability for self-executing AI agents becomes increasingly feasible.

If a fully autonomous AI were to issue its own cryptocurrency, it would disrupt both the traditional financial system and the prevailing regulatory structures. These agents could issue and trade digital assets without an easily identifiable human or organizational counterpart to regulate. Such activities would render current regulatory assumptions obsolete, as they rely on identifiable actors and entities to enforce accountability. This detachment from direct human involvement challenges the enforcement paradigm in its entirety.

At the same time, the problems of centralized intervention highlight how regulation often fails when attempting to control decentralized, voluntary actions, as it disrupts the natural mechanisms of the market. In the case of AI agents, their autonomous decision-making and transaction capabilities render them unfit for regulation by any traditional means. The consequences of enforcing control on these agents could extend to unintentional suppression of innovation or the misapplication of penalties on developers rather than the agents themselves.

What are your thoughts on this subject? Let us know what you think in the comments section below.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。