#UK court halts treasure hunt plan#
Hot Topic Overview
Overview
A UK court has rejected IT engineer James Howells' application to search a Newport landfill for a hard drive containing $735 million worth of Bitcoin. Howells accidentally discarded the hard drive containing the Bitcoin in 2013 and has been trying to persuade Newport City Council to allow him access to the landfill to dig for it. However, the court ruled that the plan posed significant environmental risks and that there was "no realistic prospect of success" at trial. As a result, Howells' treasure hunt has been halted, and he will be unable to recover his valuable Bitcoin from the landfill.
Ace Hot Topic Analysis
Analysis
A UK court has rejected IT engineer James Howells' application to search a Newport landfill for a hard drive containing $735 million worth of Bitcoin. The judge ruled that the case had "no realistic prospect of success" at trial, citing environmental risks as the primary reason. Howells accidentally discarded the hard drive containing Bitcoin in 2013, when the cryptocurrency was worth only a few cents. It is now worth a fortune. Newport City Council has consistently refused to allow access to the landfill for excavation, as it would cause irreversible environmental damage. Despite Howells proposing various solutions, including using robots and drones for excavation, the court ultimately sided with environmental protection, denying his request. This incident has sparked discussions about digital asset security and environmental protection, reminding people to exercise extreme caution when handling important data.
Public Sentiment · Discussion Word Cloud
Public Sentiment
Discussion Word Cloud
Classic Views
Finding a Bitcoin hard drive poses environmental risks, and the court believes the case has no realistic chance of success.
Newport City Council refused to excavate the landfill, arguing that it would cause environmental pollution.
James Howells attempted to recover his $735 million Bitcoin hard drive through legal means, but was rejected by the court.
The incident sparked discussions about digital asset security and environmental protection.