@ Virtuals_io Layout @ Solana Layout is not a complete 'migration' Recently, while traveling outside, I saw many people in the Virtual group discussing @ virtualis_io, as well as members of the @ otherempt0 team and the entire @ base ecosystem project discussing @ coinbase. Leaving aside things that cannot be judged, overall, for @ virtualis_io itself, are there any benefits or drawbacks to going all chain to @ solana? The benefits include: 1. Adequate liquidity: At present, Solana has the most P young players, so there is no need to worry about funding. The concern is that it may not be able to attract funding; 2. Convenient collaboration: @Virtuals_io is already associated with @ JupiterExchange@ MeteoraAG is located in an office, representing the light of Malaysia. Previously, we couldn't collaborate without being on the same chain, but now we can collaborate. 3. Expand the ecosystem: It is already a dominant ecological position on @ base, and after coming to @ solana, it happens to expand its influence. If you can capture any market share from @ pumpdotfun, it's profitable. The drawbacks include: 1. Blurred positioning: Previously, @ virtualis_io could be compared to the platform coin of @ base, but after cross chain, it may not work as the relationship may encounter problems. 2. PVP exacerbation: The probability of PVP will increase, as Solana is a chain known for its speed. I used to be able to sleep peacefully at @ base, but now I'm at @ solana and it's just a matter of time. 3. Increased competition: Previously, I was a dominant player in @ base, but after crossing the chain to @ solana, I had to compete with @ pumpdotfun. 4. Code update: I didn't come to @ solana before because Rust wasn't very good at it. Can I keep up with the code now? I'm not quite sure. How do you view these things? I think these things need to be viewed with dialectical thinking, and we cannot only see the bad and not the good. 1. Finding support due to difficulties: It is foreseeable that@ All ecosystems on the base actually have a 'not so good' relationship with @ coinbase, after all, not listing one's own public chain projects is like the relationship between projects on @ BNBCHAIN and @ Binance. 2. People go higher: Secondly@ Solana itself is a bigger stage. In the case where @ base has already reached its limit, going to a place with greater traffic, funds, and capital is the right path in itself. I don't think there's anything wrong with being a phoenix head instead of a chicken head. Is 1% tax really a problem? Many people think that @ virtualis_io's royalty of 1% is very high, but they don't know that @ virtualis_io and @ JupiterExchange teams are together. Royalties can be added as LP for individuals, 1% for teams, and 0.2% for individuals. Don't forget how much tax is levied when TRUMP is launched 😂。 I think if this can make money, it doesn't matter how much tax it is, the key is to make money. How to view these I think everything has to be left to the market to see. No one can predict what will happen in the future, just like I never thought that buying Virtual at 0.02 would yield a profit of 200x, even though I didn't sell and lost 70%. And most importantly, why only allow AI to occur at @ base, while other chains such as @ solana cannot have true AI? @_What do you think, Kaitoai?