Fifth Circuit Rules Tornado Cash Sanctions Exceeded US Treasury’s Authority

CN
6 hours ago

On Jan. 21, 2025, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals delivered its ruling, responding to a lawsuit filed by six individuals who claimed the sanctions violated the Administrative Procedure Act. The court concluded that the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) exceeded its jurisdiction by sanctioning Tornado Cash’s immutable smart contracts, which, by their nature, cannot be owned or controlled by any party.

OFAC sanctioned Tornado Cash in Aug. 2022, alleging its involvement in laundering illicit funds for North Korea’s Lazarus Group. The sanctions restricted any transactions using Tornado Cash and categorized its smart contracts as “property.” However, the court rejected this classification, pointing out that the unchangeable nature of these contracts means they cannot be modified, controlled, or owned—not even by their original creators.

According to the court, Tornado Cash’s immutable smart contracts fall outside the definition of “property” under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. It stressed that these self-executing programs operate independently and remain impervious to shutdowns or alterations.

The ruling also addressed the plaintiffs’ defense of Tornado Cash’s lawful applications, such as ensuring financial privacy and protecting against cyberthreats. One plaintiff described using the service to donate anonymously to Ukraine’s war effort, avoiding potential retaliation. Another cited the need to safeguard their identity after receiving threats tied to their cryptocurrency holdings.

This decision represents a pivotal moment for advocates of blockchain privacy, as it could constrain the government’s ability to sanction decentralized technologies. Legal analysts anticipate that the ruling will contribute to ongoing discussions about cryptocurrency regulation and the governance of open-source blockchain systems.

OFAC has not yet indicated whether it will escalate the case to the Supreme Court. For now, the case returns to the district court, where further proceedings will take place in light of the appellate court’s findings.

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

Share To
APP

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink