Author: Haotian

A simple sharing of the investment thinking logic for various categories of AI Agents:

1) Standalone AI: Strong user perception, vertical application scenarios, short product validation cycles, but limited ceiling. Investment must be based on experiential applications, such as new strategy analysis standalone AI; no amount of boasting from others can compare to practical experience. For example: $AIXBT$LUNA;

2) Frameworks and Standards: High technical barriers, grand visions and goals, the degree of market (developer) adoption is crucial, and the ceiling is very high. Investment should be based on a comprehensive assessment of the project's technical quality, founder background, narrative logic, and practical application. For example: $arc, $REI, $swarms, $GAME;

3) Launchpad Platforms: Well-developed tokenomics, strong ecological synergy, can generate positive flywheel effects, but a prolonged absence of blockbuster projects can severely damage market expectations. It is advisable to consider investing when market enthusiasm is high and innovation is frequent, and to adopt a wait-and-see approach during collective downturns. For example: #Virtual, $MetaV;

4) DeFi Trading AI Agents: Agents landing in the endgame form of Crypto, with vast imaginative space, but uncertainties exist in intent matching, solver execution, and transaction result accuracy. Therefore, it is essential to experience it first before deciding whether to follow. For example: $BUZZ, $POLY, $GRIFT, $NEUR;

5) Creative Specialty AI Agents: The sustainability of the creativity itself determines everything, high user stickiness, and has IP value attributes. However, the initial momentum often affects the later market expectation height, which tests the team's ability for continuous updates and iterations. For example: $SPORE, $ZAILGO;

6) Narrative-Oriented AI Agents: Attention should be paid to whether the project team's background is upright, whether they can continuously launch iterative updates, and whether the white paper's plans can gradually materialize. The most critical factor is whether they can maintain a leading position throughout a narrative cycle. For example: #ai16z$Focai;

7) Business Organization-Promoting AI Agents: This tests the coverage of resources for B-end projects, the degree of product and strategy advancement, and the imaginative space for continuously refreshing new milestones. Of course, actual platform data indicators are also crucial. For example: #ZEREBRO, #GRIFFAIN, $SNAI, $fxn;

8) AI Metaverse Series AI Agent Platforms: AI Agents advancing 3D modeling and metaverse application scenarios indeed have advantages, but the commercial vision ceiling is too high, with significant hardware dependencies and long product cycles. Attention should be paid to the project's continuous iteration and implementation, especially the manifestation of "practicality" value. For example: $HYPER, $AVA;

9) AI Platform Series: Whether dealing with data, algorithms, computing power, inference fine-tuning, DePIN, etc., all belong to the "consumer-grade" market, requiring the introduction of a large demand-side market. Undoubtedly, AI Agents represent a market with explosive potential, so how to connect with AI Agents is crucial. For example: @hyperboliclabs, @weRoamxyz, @dinlol_, @nillionnetwork;

Note: The above is only an incomplete summary of AI Agent categories, with the listed tickers provided for research and learning reference, not as investment advice. DYOR!

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。