On July 6, 2024, Bruce Fenton, President of Watchdog Capital and host of the Satoshi Roundtable, criticized Jack Dorsey for permitting censorship during his tenure as Twitter’s CEO prior to Elon Musk’s takeover. “Dear Jack, some people say you have changed and should be welcomed to bitcoin,” Fenton wrote. “Personally I don’t want you, your companies or your woke executives anywhere near Bitcoin development.”

The bitcoin proponent added:

You blocked Americans from viewing true information. You engaged in the largest private sector censorship operation in human history. There may not be a single living person more responsible for sweeping censoring and blocking of the truth than you. You even blocked the President of the United States and had Biden’s FBI in your offices.

Dorsey’s tenure at Twitter has faced allegations of widespread censorship, notably during the Hunter Biden laptop incident and the banning of former President Donald Trump on Jan. 6, 2021. Additionally, the Twitter Files exposed extensive censorship measures directed by senior executives at the behest of the Biden administration. Following his acquisition of Twitter, Elon Musk publicly revealed these actions taken by the platform’s previous management.

This is not the first time Dorsey has been openly accused of censorship. During the 2021 Bitcoin Conference organized by Bitcoin Magazine, Dorsey was heckled on stage by Trump supporter and conservative influencer Laura Loomer. “Your company executives are extreme progressives,” Fenton added on Saturday. “How can they be trusted? Why should Bitcoiners welcome development contributions from Block when the company and its leadership have values that are completely antithetical to the Bitcoin values of freedom and decentralization?” the Watchdog Capital executive asked.

Fenton added:

All holders are welcome. Developers and funders should show merit and philosophical alignment first.

Not everyone shared Fenton’s view. Pierre Rochard, Vice President of Research at Riot Platforms, defended Dorsey, stating he does not need to justify his actions. “Jack is doing good promoting nostr and doing good funding Bitcoin development,” Rochard remarked. “Both are permissionless and he doesn’t have any explaining to do,” the Riot executive added. Fenton retorted, “Gimme a break. The largest private censor in human history. He most certainly does have explaining to do.”

Controversies like these highlight the ongoing debate about individual influence in the decentralized realm of Bitcoin. As the industry progresses, addressing these conflicts will be vital to preserving the fundamental principles that underpin the social contract of the leading cryptocurrency network. After Rochard’s remark, many others voiced their agreement with Fenton’s perspective. “It’s more than fair to expect explanations for what happened during his time at Twitter,” one person responded.

“Notice how you didn’t address any of the actual points Bruce made?” another said to the Riot executive. “Jack is a communist technocrat. His entire record proves he is an enemy of Bitcoin and humanity in general.”

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。