#The screenshot of Wang Xing being scammed is fake.#
Hot Topic Overview
Overview
SlowMist Security Team has released an investigation report confirming that the circulating chat screenshots regarding actor Wang Xing's alleged scam are fake. The screenshot claims that Wang Xing has "boarded the ship" and requires a 14,000 USDT security deposit, along with a cryptocurrency address. SlowMist's investigation found that the address has received a total of 2.22 million USDT since September 2024, but no income transactions related to 14,000 USDT were discovered. Additionally, the chat timestamps in the screenshot do not align with the image timestamps, further confirming its fabrication. SlowMist reminds users to remain vigilant when encountering online information and to verify its authenticity to avoid falling prey to rumors.
Ace Hot Topic Analysis
Analysis
SlowMist Security Team released an investigation report, confirming that the circulating chat screenshots related to the alleged scam involving actor Wang Xing are fake. The screenshots showed that Wang Xing had "boarded the ship" and requested a 14,000 USDT security deposit, along with a cryptocurrency address. SlowMist team analyzed the address and found that it had received a total of 2.22 million USDT since September 2024, but no related income transactions for 14,000 USDT were found. Moreover, the chat time in the screenshots displayed 02:46, while the image time showed 19:46, indicating an inconsistency in time further proving the information fabrication. SlowMist team reminds users to remain vigilant when encountering online information, and to verify the information to avoid believing rumors.
Public Sentiment · Discussion Word Cloud
Public Sentiment
Discussion Word Cloud
Classic Views
The chat screenshots related to Wang Xing's alleged scam circulating online are fake.
The cryptocurrency address mentioned in the screenshots has no direct connection to Wang Xing's alleged scam.
The chat time and image time in the screenshots are inconsistent.
The 14,000 USDT transfer record mentioned in the screenshots was not found in the on-chain data.