#Pump.fun data manipulation#
Hot Topic Overview
Overview
The founder of Pump.fun has denied the statistics published by the Dune platform regarding the profitability of Pump.fun users. He pointed out that the data did not account for token purchases tied to Raydium, did not consider unrealized profits, and included transactions from a large number of bots and AI agents. He emphasized that approximately 30% of wallets only made one transaction, which was a sale, and it is impossible for real human users to be behind these wallet activities. Therefore, the actual number of profitable users and the amount of profit may be much higher than the data statistically provided by the Dune platform.
Ace Hot Topic Analysis
Analysis
The founder of Pump.fun has denied the statistics on user earnings data on Dune, claiming there are statistical errors in the data. He points out that the data does not include token purchases that are already bound to Raydium, does not take into account unrealized profits, and that out of over 13 million traders, many are bots and AI agents, with approximately 30% of wallets only making a single transaction, which is unlikely to be genuine. The founder believes that these factors have led to biased data statistics, and the actual number of profitable and highly profitable wallets may be an order of magnitude higher than what is shown.
Public Sentiment · Discussion Word Cloud
Public Sentiment
Discussion Word Cloud
Classic Views
The founder of Pump.fun believes that Dune data statistics are incorrect and have not taken into account token purchases bound to Raydium, leading to the omission of some users' earnings.
The founder of Pump.fun believes that Dune data does not consider unrealized profits, leading to an underestimation of some users' actual earnings.
The founder of Pump.fun believes that Dune data contains a large number of bots and AI agents, leading to data distortion.
The founder of Pump.fun believes that approximately 30% of wallets in Dune data have only made one transaction, and it is impossible for real human users to be behind these wallet activities.