#Pump.fun Profitability Data in Question#
Hot Topic Overview
Overview
Pump.fun's profit data has sparked controversy. Dune data shows that only 0.408% of Pump.fun traders have achieved profits exceeding $10,000. However, Pump.fun's founder has denied this data, claiming that the data publisher's statistics have the following issues: they did not account for token purchases that were already bound to Raydium, they did not consider unrealized profits, and among the over 13 million traders, many are bots and AI agents. The founder also pointed out that about 30% of wallets have only made one transaction, which is a sell, and it is impossible for real human users to be behind these wallet activities. Currently, Pump.fun's profit data remains controversial and has not been officially confirmed.
Ace Hot Topic Analysis
Analysis
The profitability data of Pump.fun is controversial. Dune data shows that only 0.408% of the 13,547,736 Pump.fun wallet addresses have achieved profits exceeding $10,000, but the Pump.fun founder has questioned this data, arguing that its statistical methods are flawed. He pointed out that Dune data does not account for token purchases tied to Raydium, while most of the profits were generated after token binding; moreover, the data does not consider unrealized profits, and many wallets holding early tokens may actually have profits far higher than the data shows; finally, he emphasized that among the over 13 million traders, many are bots and AI agents, with about 30% of wallets having only made one transaction, which are unlikely to be real users. Therefore, the Pump.fun founder believes that Dune data underestimates the actual profitability, and the number of actual profitable wallets may be far higher than the data shows.
Public Sentiment · Discussion Word Cloud
Public Sentiment
Discussion Word Cloud
Classic Views
Pump.fun's profit data is controversial. Dune data shows that only 0.458% of user wallet addresses have made profits exceeding $10,000, while the founder believes that the data statistics are incorrect and have not taken into account token purchases tied to Raydium, unrealized profits, and the existence of a large number of bots and AI agents, which distort the data.
Pump.fun's profit data may be underestimated because Dune data does not consider token purchases tied to Raydium, while most of the profits are generated after token binding.
Pump.fun's users have a large number of bots and AI agents, about 30% of wallets have only made one transaction, these wallets may not be real users.
Pump.fun's profit data may be biased because Dune data does not consider unrealized profits, some early token holders may have high unrealized profits.