I fully agree, and I think it's still a game between the market and the Federal Reserve. It's a bit like the logic where if a son owes an online loan and forces me to repay the money, then if I don't change my son, I'll get beaten up. Son believes that Laozi will definitely take care of himself, while Laozi believes that there are more than one son, and the overall management of the sons will be more important. As long as the son in debt does not harm his life, he will bear it himself. There is no right or wrong, only a choice. Either my son is injured more severely and I have to take action, or my son has not been beaten up enough and I am still waiting for him to learn from his mistakes.