🧠 How do ordinary people with IQ 50 interpret Trump's tariff policies? On April 2nd, Liberation Day, Trump announced an explosive tariff policy, which in simple terms: Give me all the taxes, not a single one. In theory, facing this type of economic policy, it is definitely not something that IQ 50 people like us can comment on. However, don't worry. We don't understand, but that doesn't mean we can't study and interpret it at all. Please bring the AI three piece set on stage: 1 Gemini Deep Research 2 Gemini 2.5 Pro The specific process is as follows: 1. What is the latest tariff policy for Gemini Deep Research first? What impact does it have on the economies of various countries? This step takes about 5 minutes, and you will receive a very detailed report. 2. Open Gemini 2.5 Pro and ask: Who are the most famous economists in the world? What schools of thought do they belong to and what is their core philosophy? In this step, you have a list of economists and their core economic concepts. 3. Attach the report obtained from the first step and have AI evaluate the report from the perspective of these economists. At this point, you can interpret this tariff policy from the perspective of these most famous economists. Finally, please find attached Gemini's conclusion: ======= Summary: The vast majority, if not all, of mainstream economists, regardless of their specific faction, are likely to hold a negative or extremely negative view of this US global tariff policy. Common concerns include causing harm to consumers (price increases, reduced choices), distorting resource allocation, potentially slowing down or even declining economic growth, triggering inflation, disrupting global supply chains, triggering destructive trade retaliation, and damaging international relations and multilateral trading systems. The points of divergence may lie in the different emphasis of analysis (e.g. free market efficiency vs. aggregate demand vs. inequality vs. human development), as well as views on the role of government intervention in the market in specific situations (although even Keynesians and Stiglitz who support moderate intervention may consider this approach wrong in such cases). The measures described in this policy document are contrary to the rules based and gradually liberalized international trade order established after World War II, and therefore will be widely criticized by economists who believe in different theories but generally agree on the benefits of trade (even if conditions permit). P. The interpretation table from the perspective of economists is also attached for your reference.