Did users create Binance, or did Binance create users? Binance has come this far thanks to its users, projects, and market. It was when the Three Kingdoms contended for supremacy that Coin An emerged from the gap between OKX and Huobi. With the attitude of "customer first" and the promise of convenient transactions and safe assets, it won the hearts of the people and now has the leading position in the industry Anyone with a little bit of historical memory knows: It's not that Binance was born to create users, projects, and markets, but that users, projects, and markets created Binance The founder of Binance, @ heyibintance, now treats user losses as a joke. The core employees on the market side responded with imprecise remarks in some "Binance friendly" groups, creating a clear information asymmetry transaction What happened afterwards? Various excuses and excuses. The external response of a company with a market value of hundreds of billions is surprisingly lackluster, to the point where the first sister even admits that 'the world is a lackluster team' Okay, if the world is a grass platform team, why should I believe that my assets can still be 'safe' with you? I used to be a loyal user of Binance, and when I put my assets in, I paid a lot of fees. Why? Because common sense tells me that asset security requires the strongest credit endorsement. I once believed that Binance could be better and become the backing of Chinese crypto, leading us to carve out a path in this chaotic market. But now what? I really like a saying: "Without freedom in criticism, praise is meaningless Binance is doing well, I am not stingy with praise; If not done well, individual investors have the right to criticize. This is not emotional, but a basic logic of fairness. In the comment section, how many users have earnestly proposed solutions - smart as a sister, it's impossible not to understand. But what was her response? play dumb Do you speak without reservation and without reservation? Only for those 'core groups'? Only for a small group of KOLs? We marginal retail investors deserve to be forgotten and kept in the dark? In the end, the conversation turned into chicken talking to duck, meaningless Market liquidity is tight, this is a fact. The existing users who are still alive in the field all have a scale in their hearts: -Has my rights been protected? -Is there any information asymmetry? -Is this fair? -Is the disclosure of information by such a grassroots team a financial crime in a legal, compliant, and regulated market? Everyone is not a fool, they know it in their hearts. Fairness, fairness, or his mother fairness - this is not a slogan, but the bottom line expectation of users on the platform Binance's current position relies on winning the hearts of the people, its bargaining power over projects, and its strongest liquidity Don't forget, where does liquidity come from? -User Without users, where would the trading volume and depth come from? Where did the industry leader come from? As a former loyal user, I just want to say: if things can be handled properly, I am willing to come back. But now, I can no longer believe that my 'coin' can be 'safe'. Losing trust, losing everything. Binance, take care of yourself. Living without land, both people and land exist; If land is lost, then both people and land are lost. Binance understands this principle. But now, I can't see the sincerity of 'saving people', only the perfunctory attitude of the grass platform team