The fundamental reason for the closure of EVM: the gap between formal network systems and the real world The Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) runs on a formal network system, designed to execute smart contracts rather than directly perceive and process real-world data. This design creates a "gap" between EVM and the real world, making it difficult for external information to be directly and decentralized integrated into the operation of EVM. Limitations of Chainlink oracle mode The Chainlink oracle aims to introduce external data into the blockchain by obtaining information from external data sources through a series of nodes, and then transmitting this information to smart contracts. However, the Chainlink pattern has the following limitations: Centralized authority: Chainlink itself, as a oracle network, plays a centralized role in data validation and transmission. Although its network consists of multiple nodes, its core mechanism still relies on the authority of the Chainlink protocol. Unable to penetrate the consensus layer: The data provided by Chainlink oracle ultimately needs to be written into the Ethereum blockchain through transactions. Due to the fact that EVM is built on top of the Ethereum consensus layer, Chainlink cannot directly "penetrate" this consensus layer, but rather "feed" data into the EVM system through transactions. This approach increases a certain degree of uncertainty and delay. Limitations of data feeding: The oracle mode is more suitable for providing specific data points (such as prices, weather, etc.) rather than processing complex and dynamic real-world information flows. Decentralized solution for GEB three-layer model The GEB model aims to achieve decentralized and real-time transmission of real-world information to EVM through a three-layer architecture BitAgere Nonlinear Perception Layer: This layer is responsible for perceiving real information in the real world, using a nonlinear perception system aimed at capturing complex and dynamic real-world data more accurately and comprehensively. By using GEB consensus currency, the perceived information is transmitted to the WASM layer to ensure decentralization and security of data transmission. WASM consensus layer: WASM (WebAssembly) serves as the second layer, built on top of the GEB network consensus, and receives data transmitted by the BitAgere layer. The WASM layer plays a role in data processing and validation, formatting and standardizing real-world data to enable it to be understood and utilized by EVM. This layer serves as an intermediary between real-world data and blockchain data. EVM execution layer: The EVM layer is built on top of the WASM virtual layer, sharing all ledger data with the WASM layer to achieve seamless data transmission. Through this architecture, EVM can directly access real-world data processed and validated by the WASM layer, enabling real-time interaction with the external world. Advantages of GEB model Decentralization: The GEB model achieves decentralized transmission and verification of real-world data through a layered architecture and consensus mechanism, avoiding reliance on a single centralized authority. Real time performance: Due to the shared ledger data between EVM and WASM layers, real-world information can be transmitted in real-time to EVM, achieving faster and more dynamic application scenarios. Complex information processing: The non-linear sensing layer and WASM processing layer of GEB can handle more complex and dynamic real-world information, expanding the application scope of EVM. summarize Compared to Chainlink's oracle mode, the GEB three-layer model provides a more decentralized, real-time, and powerful real-world information integration solution. Through a layered architecture and consensus mechanism, the GEB model is expected to break the closed nature of EVM and achieve a closer integration between blockchain and the real world.