Just creating a cryptocurrency, but creating a decentralized system with self-awareness. The biggest feature of this system is the game between miners. In the Bitcoin network, miners compete for computing power to generate new blocks, which is essentially a game of resources and computing power. And this game is not just a technical competition, but also a manifestation of decentralized social consensus. Through this competitive process, the longest chain rule of Bitcoin gives rise to the most powerful ledger, and the content of the ledger ultimately determines the consensus and transaction history of the network. Every miner is a participant in this process and a part of driving the evolution of the Bitcoin network. This process ensures the fairness and decentralization of the Bitcoin network, while also avoiding issues like Ethereum where developers can freely modify system rules and transaction content. This design not only creates an efficient blockchain network technically, but more importantly, it provides an economic system with self-awareness. In the world of Bitcoin, there is no single centralized controller in the system, but a decentralized social consensus naturally emerges through the game between miners. This is precisely the key to Bitcoin's ability to solve security issues in the real world. BCH and BTC: The Battle of the Lion King and the Game of Consensus In the fork history of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin Cash (BCH), as a branch of Bitcoin, once challenged Bitcoin's market position. However, Bitcoin Cash ultimately failed to replace Bitcoin due to its lack of "vitality" like Bitcoin. Bitcoin stands out among numerous forks precisely because of its powerful human-computer interaction and ability to solve real-world problems. Satoshi Nakamoto designed a system with self-awareness and practical application value through Bitcoin, while BCH's consensus mechanism cannot compete with Bitcoin's widespread acceptance due to its failure to truly solve real-world problems. Although BCH has a similar Proof of Work (PoW) mechanism, it does not have the strong social consensus and vitality of Bitcoin. Tools and Lifeforms: The Essential Difference between Ethereum and Bitcoin Unlike Bitcoin, Ethereum is essentially a tool system. Although it supports smart contracts and decentralized applications (DApps), its design is still developer led, with the core control of the system in the hands of developers. Ethereum developers can modify contracts and accounts, which prevents it from becoming a true living system. In contrast, Bitcoin's decentralization and self-protection mechanisms ensure that each user has complete control over their assets, avoiding the centralization risks faced by tool systems like Ethereum. The decentralized game of Bitcoin and the challenges of the real world Returning to Bitcoin itself, it is not just a cryptocurrency, but also a tool for solving real-world problems through decentralized gaming. Satoshi Nakamoto created a human-machine interaction system through Bitcoin, and the design concept of this system is not simply to pursue technical perfection, but to address trust, consensus, and security issues in the real world. In the Bitcoin network, every miner and user is a part of this large system, and everyone works together to maintain the stability and development of the system through competition for resources and computing power. This design of equal competition ensures the decentralized nature of Bitcoin, rather than the control of any single developer or group. Satoshi Nakamoto's design is not only for the efficient operation of technology, but also to pursue a mechanism that meets the needs of the real world - to solve trust and security issues in human society. Human computer interaction and mechanical understanding: the key to solving real-world problems In the pursuit of resolving the fundamental differences between Bitcoin and Ethereum, we have proposed a new system design concept. This concept is not limited to simply replicating existing technologies, but is committed to creating a human-machine interaction system that can truly understand and perceive the real world. What we need to do is to understand the real world mechanically, rather than relying solely on tool systems, to build systems with self-awareness. In this process, we are not satisfied with just implementing a Proof of Work (POW) system like Bitcoin, but hope to develop a system that can be universally applied in various fields through innovative methods and means. We do not want to repeat the path of a 'tool system', which is often short-sighted and lacks profound significance. What we need to do is to create a brand new world, which is the true meaning of life and technological progress. GEB team's mission: to enable machinery to understand reality The core goal of the GEB team is to solve the problem of how machines understand the real world and how to enable machines to solve real-world problems through human-computer interaction. Just as Satoshi Nakamoto designed Bitcoin to solve currency system problems, we also hope to promote and apply human-computer interaction technology in a similar way to solve more real-world problems. Currently, the blockchain we see