Questioning KiloEx: Before Learning to Be Dex, Please Learn to Be Personal Today, without discussing technology or storytelling, let's talk about airdrops and ask KiloEx a basic question: Before learning how to do Dex, can you first learn how to be a person? ________ 1、 What are you afraid of when you ban words, delete posts, or kick people? What are you covering up again? Let's not talk about anything else, about this point, the slots are really full! It's already 2025, why are there still such low-level and annoying operational methods? Afraid of criticism, what kind of cryptocurrency circle are you working on? Why don't truly responsible projects dare to face questioning and be open and transparent. What is the value of the project when only a group of flatterers are bragging about it? Instead of addressing user inquiries, they cover up and shift the topic. What are you afraid of? To put it bluntly, are you guys working on Dex or Web2 forum administrators? Are you also planning to learn from a senior in Dex operations and "unplug the network cable" at critical moments? Not afraid of criticism is a fundamental quality of cryptocurrency projects. The only way to survive is to put away the damned Internet operations, face up to the scolding and respond positively. ________ 2、 Is it a mouse den after all? Or is it a disguised shipment? According to the on chain data provided by community users and top on chain analysts,%: one ⃣ Market maker account C (0xfd01755119557ba4F39E9fcFb8c3eec47EeDb198) suddenly received a large number of tokens shortly after the market opened. These tokens were not purchased by the market, but were directly transferred by the project party. two ⃣ Multi signature wallet B (0x6d76cfcaaAEe0F037B493C93FEF43C97f6b5C5) holds 5% of the tokens, but has sent huge amounts of tokens to multiple unidentified addresses. Most of these addresses are not ordinary investors, but suspected stakeholders. The ultimate flow of these funds points to two noteworthy accounts: 0xec419178131337D09A4a7521A7753e201195Fa66 has been selling at a fixed pace every minute since receiving over 200000 tokens, and has sold 100000 so far. After receiving 200000 official coins, 0xC73411B555Da41Af84E8d40D736ec2773321DB98 was quickly transferred to 0x6A276a58C5194eF196B58442f627Dba070CB37BF, which is suspected to be associated with an official address. May I ask KiloEx: Is this a real market making or a disguised shipment? What is the relationship between these fund movements and the authorities? ________ 3、 Exchange liquidity: is it a "market behavior" or a "black screen operation"? Let's take another look at the issue of exchange liquidity. KiloEx only gave hundreds of thousands of coins to exchanges such as KuCoin, MEXC, and Gate as liquidity. Is this amount of coins really enough for the market? And also: one ⃣ Why do you need to transfer money to the same exchange through five or six different addresses? two ⃣ Is it to hide the flow of funds? Or is it to create the illusion of multi-party participation? Or are you trading off the exchange and secretly dumping goods? After all, it is disguised as a "market maker" and actually launders funds and creates false depth through internal trading. KiloEx， Please give an explanation, are you also playing this game? ________ 4、 Can the 'locked warehouse' section of the team be unlocked at any time? KiloEx claims that core holdings such as teams and foundations are "locked in," but it seems like a joke at the moment. Is Dex being so lax? The fact is, your 'locked' account has no smart contract restrictions, and all tokens are only stored in regular EOA addresses. This means that these locked tokens can be unlocked and smashed at any time, but community users can only foolishly trust your 'lock up constraints'. So may I ask: one ⃣ How do you ensure that these tokens will not be secretly sold off at market highs? two ⃣ If you really want to lock your warehouse, why not just use smart contracts to lock it up, but leave a backdoor? Is the so-called lock up just to deceive trust, rather than to truly stabilize the market? ________ 5、 What about the 26 claim transactions before 22:30? According to records, when the claim was officially opened at 22:10, the front-end crashed and ordinary users couldn't even grab it. But on chain data shows that 26 claim transactions have already been completed before 22:30. Excuse me? one ⃣ Who are these 26 transactions in the event of front-end crash? two ⃣ Who did you give priority to? ________ 6、 PUA users, opaque point redemption, "vacuum investment" or "real harvest"? According to numerous feedback from community users, the vast majority of retail investors have been targeted, but the CEO claims that 70% of the players on the chain are profitable. Leaving aside whether they are lying or not, let's just calculate a vague account: Firstly, based on a rough estimate of the cumulative trading volume of the entire platform, the project's commission income is approximately $4000w. However, only $1000w worth of tokens were airdropped to the community, resulting in a 20% return on investment for everyone. This is consistent with the 90% loss rate reported by most members of the community. Secondly, the point redemption ratio is severely opaque, with many users reporting that there are 100:1 and 200:1 ratios, with almost no discernible pattern. Is it a random ratio? Finally, as a person, since you plan to use airdrops to increase your activity and trading volume, the most basic quality is to at least not let users lose money, let alone let them lose 90% of their money. Your PUA has raised everyone's expectations, and in the end, if you are not a good person, you will make a big mess. Users will definitely do you! What we want is a transparent and responsible response. If you really want to do Dex well, then show your attitude, dispel the doubts of the community, and make a truly fair and reasonable airdrop solution. Otherwise, KiloEx will definitely become the next joke to fall into the darkness!