Amnis didn't just mess himself up, it rubbed Aptos' face against the trusted floor of the community. @Aptos gives me the feeling of a fast chain, a painful heart, and very little money. I thought I was laying out the early ecology, but later realized that I was the one being laid out 🙂 Aptos has always talked about how fast their TPS is, claiming to be a dark horse on the Layer1 track, with a proud head resembling an exhibition race. The collapse of the team began at the end of last year, with the CEO resigning, the DeFi ecosystem leader being eliminated, and a large number of teams being kicked out. After the new CEO came on board, he seemed to have done some things, but in reality, there was no change. In the past year, I often suggested to team members how to create an effective economic flywheel, and my saliva dried up without any change. I will take the recent @ AmnisFinance TGE in the community as an example, which is the flagship and Aptos supported agreement, the first batch of LFM members. Why do I say this protocol is Aptos' junk fighter? You should understand the meaning of junk fighter. Do I need to explain its meaning again? It's ridiculous that the authorities are still unaware and conducting fake performances to celebrate, stepping on countless corpses to celebrate. How can we drink that glass of wine! first, Fengmi wants to say: any Airdrop airdrop 🪂 The end is not the endpoint, but rather the beginning of testing the ecological and project's "community perception". Let's review the airdrop of the junk fighter @ AmnisFinance. After my review, the official contacted me for communication. Briefly restate their viewpoint based on the airdrop. 1. Airdrop principle: Reward real contributors, Amnis as the LSD protocol, reward APT stakers as the core, and all incentive activities (such as Lucky Wheel, Special APR) are designed based on "how much to stake and how long to last" 2. Retrospective airdrop mechanism design, airdrop points are based on three dimensions: Number of pledged APTs+duration of pledge+degree of participation in other protocols using LSD tokens The top 10000 stakers have been identified as the main contributing users These 10000 people are divided into 10 levels and receive different amounts of AMI based on their TVL contributions The total airdrop is 8% of the total tokens, with nearly 40% allocated to stakers, 440000 pledged users only gave 10000 addresses. 3. A small portion of airdrops will be used for Draconian NFT holders, social event participants, and the remaining airdrops will be used for future airdrop rounds to promote ecological growth. 4. What about users who haven't received airdrops? • Points can be converted into next round of lucky wheel vouchers (lottery) • Have the opportunity to win up to 120 amAPT Jackpot rewards Simultaneously participating in social tasks to obtain NFTs → redeemable for AMI Fengmi Soul Interrogation @ AmnisFinance: 1. The distribution of airdrops is extremely centralized: 440000 addresses are only airdropped to 10000 people, causing most real users to have zero airdrops. You have received so many official rewards, worked hard on marketing, and pledged seasons for more than ten seasons. You say this is a 'community feedback', but the fact is: Throughout the entire event, there were over 440000 participating addresses, but in the end, less than 10000 users were airdropped. This is not community distribution, this is precise screening and centralized bias. You turned 97.7% of real participants into runners, and ultimately only rewarded the few users with large positions. 2. The airdrop weight is heavily biased towards "big TVLs", ignoring real participants and early real active participants Although you emphasize that "staking quantity+time" is the measurement standard, this actually excludes small users with limited funds but sustained activity and high participation by default. Many early adopters and real community members who participated in multiple activities were excluded one size fits all because they did not have a heavy APT. Does this truly reflect the original intention of "backtracking"? The equation of funding=participation is crude, completely ignoring small active users and long-term loyal users. I have pledged accounts worth over $2000 for one year without any airdrops. The result is: 'Money comes first, early freelancing' 3. You said it was calculated according to the "integral model", but the community did not see the complete integral algorithm, weight ratio, and grading basis. 4. NFTs receive a large number of airdrops, while NFTs have almost no practical utility You raised funds through NFTs, which have almost no actual value in the agreement, no staking rights, and no governance purposes, but can still receive considerable amounts in airdrops. Opaque and unfair, causing great anger. And this anger actually comes from aptos' inaction. On the other hand, those users who truly pledge APT, provide TVL for the protocol, and bear the actual opportunity cost are users who pay the cost in your product, and even have to pay fees, but are ruthlessly abandoned in airdrops. You reward speculators, but neglect long-term users who truly support the growth of your agreement. You say you value pledged users, so has this wave of airdrop distribution already dealt a heavy blow to your face? Taking me as an example, for example, I pledged funds on my account and held stAPT for a long time, but the vast majority of my valued users were killed. Amnis' airdrop is not about not sending, but about 'sending without logic, without emotion, without community'. The technology of issuing coins is one size fits all, but the distribution method is very old. There is one thing I must say: I am not simply angry because I did not receive the airdrop. Furthermore, in this so-called 'ecological support' airdrop farce, I have serious doubts about Aptos' ecological organizational ability and long-term strategic vision. one ️⃣ The importance of LSD is self-evident, but Aptos personally destroyed a direction that had the opportunity to grow The Liquidity Pledge Protocol (LSD) is the infrastructure of DeFi, serving as a bridge and closed loop for APT to flow from CEX to the on chain ecosystem. This product category releases the liquidity of pledged assets, improving token utilization and capital efficiency Can enhance the security and decentralization of the network... (not elaborated) And Amnis was one of the few native LSD protocols on Aptos. As a result, the airdrop distribution of this critical track project collapsed directly, and community trust completely collapsed. This is not an issue with the Amnis family, this is another consumption of Aptos' trust in the community. two ️⃣ Aptos' 'support' is more like a nominal cooperation rather than ecological co construction Aptos has indeed provided Amnis with a lot of resource support, as far as I know, at least a large amount of token rewards, because Amnis worked in marketing for a year and drew a one-year prize, but throughout the entire process, the form outweighs the substance: • Has not formed a combined effect with the core ecosystem (I have always hoped for something in the ecosystem, and I remember the meme wave also hoped for some content, but I won't mention it here for now. In the next special topic, aptos cannot perceive market sentiment and is seriously lagging behind! Most likely, the team leader in this area is not capable, although I don't know who is responsible) • Failure to provide reasonable advice or community guidance on airdrop logic before distribution You just put the logo on the homepage, but selectively ignored the feedback mechanism of the entire community. Ultimately, this led to the Amnis airdrop becoming a negative example, while Aptos silently withdrew as if nothing had happened. Just like all the previous inaction! The official Twitter and the person in charge are still all kinds of high-end, shouting and lying down, how are we TPS doing, three ️⃣ The failure of Amnis is essentially a concentrated manifestation of Aptos' ecological design flaws APT urgently needs a "narrative+scenario" closed loop, while LSD is the value center that connects lock-in, trading, and collateral. Amnis could have taken on this task, but it turned out to be a typical short-term story of "coming up one wave, leaving one wave". Excuse me, is this what you call ecological long termism? ✅ So my viewpoint is very clear: 1. The failure of Amnis is not only a problem with the project, but also a serious dereliction of duty by Aptos in community management, ecological guidance, and user relations. 2. Amnis didn't just mess himself up, it rubbed Aptos' face against the trusted floor of the community. 3. This is not Amnis losing face, this is Aptos ecosystem slapping itself in the face. 4. In today's world where LSD should serve as a key node in the ecological value loop, Aptos failed to support Amnis and even allowed it to use airdrops to shatter community emotions. This is not a collapse of a project, but a complete failure of ecological strategy cognition and user understanding. 5. Amnis was originally the facade of Aptos, but ended up becoming a 'tool for cutting community trust'. No matter how well the face saving project is done, Aptos himself will be the last to give up. You could have achieved a key direction, but allowed it to collapse; You could have led a win-win situation, but ended up with a lot of resentment. The Aptos ecosystem has been a chain without any wealth effect in the past year. I witnessed the entire launch of DeFi to the official claim of 1 billion TVL. Those who are interested carefully look at the several protocols inside and probably understand in their hearts. Of course, it is highly likely that no one cares, no one cares. We are not asking for an 'airdrop', we are asking for an organized, rhythmic, and respectful Web3 ecosystem co construction. Unfortunately, Aptos submitted an unsatisfactory answer sheet this time. Why does it always fail? I have been relentlessly pursuing it, thinking that I am at the forefront of the Web3 revolution on this track, but in the end, I only became a cash cow for capital 🤷‍♂️。 Thank you Aptos for teaching me another lesson: there is no faith in the adult world. I am very grateful for Web3. I have gained a lot in the industry, and Aptos has also given people like us a big cake and reward. However, they gradually fell flat afterwards. After 2 years, I came to see this ecosystem, which was one of the opportunities I saw when I looked at the entire EVM ecosystem, SOL ecosystem, BTCfi ecosystem, Move ecosystem, etc., and re selected the Alpha opportunity for configuration I am very grateful for Web3, which has allowed me to see through the real market ecology, capital logic, and human nature. I am not writing this to express how much money I have lost. I just hope that even if I lose, I will lose clearly and openly. I chose the path myself, even if I kneel down, I will walk it through. Besides, as we get older, losing some money is nothing.