Reflection as an Electronic Beggar: Path Selection and Value Game of Ecological Incentive Strategies for Blockchain Public Chain Projects In the cyclical evolution of cryptocurrency, the construction strategy of public chain ecology ultimately presents two typical paradigms: The ecological alliance model represented by Aptos and Starknet, and the wealth effect driven model typical of Sui. These two path choices reflect different understandings of market laws by public chain builders. one ️⃣ The Ecological Alliance Model between Aptos and Starknet Build ecological barriers through targeted support for KOLs and cooperative communities. The advantages of this model are: -Quickly form a technical narrative matrix and lower user cognitive barriers through professional content output -Forming a community of shared interests and enhancing ecological resilience to risks The disadvantage of this mode is that: Excessive reliance on top KOLs leads to a monopoly of discourse power, centralized community governance, and weak growth in actual on chain activity and TVL. two ️⃣ SUI's Wealth Effect Driven Model Using the self reinforcing mechanism of token economics, attract users' real money and silver through FOMO emotions. The advantages of this model are: -Create wealth memory points and generate FOMO emotions through high-frequency airdrops. -Design a multi-level incentive system to form a fund siphon. -Building a community identity of 'early participants as beneficiaries'. At the same time, under this model, there are basically no disadvantages, and the project side is also easier to ship, without the need for Aptos and Starknet to constantly discount shipments through OTC. To summarize the above content in plain language is: If a public chain wants to attract people, it can either follow the path of Aptos and Starknet to "send money to relatives", or follow the path of Sui to "help everyone earn money together". From the results, it can be seen that projects that can truly make money for users are more willing to invest and participate. Why is the Sui model more effective in retaining people and money? 90% of ordinary people participating in blockchain are looking for opportunities to make money! 90% of ordinary people participating in blockchain are looking for opportunities to make money! 90% of ordinary people participating in blockchain are looking for opportunities to make money! 90% of ordinary people participating in blockchain are looking for opportunities to make money! How long can Aptos and Starknet maintain their popularity by sending money to bloggers and partners? Isn't the project still limited to continuous OTC shipments at the bottom? And then the price keeps getting lower and lower? Everyone is here to make money, please all project parties, learn SUI!