See if the macro can make a fortune (make money) and whether it can directly or indirectly guide investment in MEME or secondary knockoffs Whether it's MEME or secondary knockoffs, they are determined by BTC's attitude. Almost 99% of them are like this. Friends, you can think about it carefully. Are most of the gold dogs and second level knockoffs on the chain born during the continuous rise of BTC? Are there any projects that go against the trend and pull the market? Yes, but very few. In other words, do you dare to play with such projects? Unless you are very familiar with the project. Yes, if the second level continues to rise, ETH or SOL still need to rise. That's right, if BTC doesn't rise, do you think ETH and SOL will continue to be hard. Friends, you can carefully compare and open the weekly chart of SOL/USDT, and compare it with the weekly chart of BTC/USDT to see if it is highly overlapping. then, BTC looks at whose face, looks at the macro. In particular, the United States has been deeply involved since 19 years ago, ETF， The President embraces encryption, Bitcoin strategic reserves, and so on, BTC has become increasingly influenced by macro factors. Let me share my personal perspective on verification and observation, whether it's the K-line or past trends, combining macro and on chain data, Long term holders of BTC firmly control the BTC market. These group entities have a very strong consensus on BTC. It can even be said that, The candlestick chart of BTC is actually a long-term chart, and upon careful analysis, it shows a pattern. Then, with the help of BTC's narrative and macro foundation, the price of BTC is gradually pushed up step by step. In the end, whether it's MEME or secondary market, many market makers behind projects also look at the macro level. Do you think the macro background is okay? BTC has a narrative, and if BTC rises, ETH and SOL also rise, and then many knockoffs rise. Did it happen in November and December last year. It's just that ETH hasn't risen much, and there hasn't been much increase in secondary altcoins either. That's because of macroeconomic tightening and insufficient market liquidity, as evidenced by the inflow of stablecoins. Let's take a look at SOL again. Is SOL rising and causing speculation on the chain. Then the macro situation is not good, BTC is not good, is it possible that the counterfeit market has disappeared, and recently the blockchain is not as hot as before. Why? Because BTC is not doing well, why is BTC not doing well? It's not that the macro situation is not good. By this point, I don't know if my friends' logic has been understood. Finally, if the macro is good, BTC is good, and bringing ETH and SOL is good, then what will market liquidity speculate on? Have you studied the market speculation tracks of each bull market since 2017, the possible speculation tracks that may appear in the future, where are the opportunities for wealth, such as what the US stock market is speculating on, and whether this impact has affected cryptocurrency. wait a minute Speaking of which, it's already quite big. Not finished yet. Actually, I have already told my friends the conclusion in my previous articles. Really, even real gold is not that genuine.