✍️ Kaito's update algorithm was criticized collectively, and even the project party was worried Overnight@ The sky of KaitoAI farmers has collapsed: the once proud project ranking has suddenly been removed and replaced by some unfamiliar names. They even rarely participate in community activities, and the few contents are still plagiarized. The project team was also dumbfounded: Where have the contributors on our list gone? Why have team members who have long dominated the rankings been demoted? The reason for all of this is that Kaito has updated its algorithm and adjusted the Yapper rankings for all projects (applicable to the past and future), aiming to solve the Farming problem and pay more attention to high-quality original content. Referring to official recommendations, the new algorithm adds the following mechanisms: ① Insight threshold can eliminate low-quality content ② Collective breeding testing mechanism ③ Quality takes priority over quantity ④ Plagiarism detection, deleting low-quality content replicas In human language, low-quality and homogeneous content will be judged as garbage, even if it is posted in large quantities, it will not help with ranking on the list. Objectively speaking, Kaito's original intention was good, but at present, there may be serious loopholes. Many community members who have been involved in community contributions for a long time and have been on the list have been beaten to death, and even the project team members who have been on the list for a long time cannot be found. As a result, you will see many Yappers go to Kaito comment area roast, mainly overseas users, and roast points focus on the following two aspects: ① I have worked hard to output, and the number of tweets and views are considerable. The previously high ranking is gone ② Some of the manuscript washing contestants have successfully risen to power, and even the project team and community members feel unfamiliar with them At the same time@ The community leader of Eclipse FND, @ Alucard_ eth, also publicly questioned the rationality of the algorithm: this is a terrible update, and I and other team members are no longer even among the top; You have defeated many active members of the Eclipse community, and the Eclipse community is unhappy. To be honest, this is the first time to see the project party openly complain about Kaito, which shows that this algorithm update does have problems. For example, the content quality itself is very subjective, how to evaluate the algorithm? Homogenized content is rampant, does the algorithm advocate for a first come, first served approach or is it a one shot solution? In addition, the algorithm pursued by Kaito may conflict with the focus of many project parties, which means that if the ranking cannot reflect real contributions, the project parties will choose to abandon Kaito and not include the ranking in the incentive scope. As a vested interest holder of Kaito, I hope @ Punk9277 can widely listen to the opinions of the project team and community, continuously optimize the algorithm, and never prioritize the algorithm, otherwise it may be backfired by the algorithm. Finally, I would like to share @ Alucard_eth's viewpoint, which is worth everyone's consideration: -The community should set the tone, attract suitable people, and actively tell farmers/counterfeiters to get out. -Over time, strangers become friends, friends become family, and the community knows who true friends are. -No algorithm can create/define the true trust we establish between each other.