On the Scams of Blockchain Technology (Falsely Filling Numbers) Blockchain technology claims to solve valuable and meaningful problems, but removing the formal system that refers to blockchain technology is meaningless. The blockchain technology has fallen into the formal system of mathematical logic symbols, and G ö del proved with the liar paradox that the formal system of mathematical logic is incomplete. So where is the incompleteness? Incompleteness eliminates self referential formal logical systems. The mathematical logic system eliminates the self in order to ensure deterministic causal logic, thus avoiding the attack of the liar paradox. And the meaning, civilization, value, and other attributes of humanity all come from the self. The formal system that excludes the self is pure formalism and emptiness. It cannot solve any meaningful and valuable problems in the real world. This is why the current blockchain technology has developed for so many years and has not yet been implemented. Even the RWA track only uses blockchain technology platforms as a more consistent cloud server platform tool. It is certain that this incomplete formalized blockchain technology platform cannot do meaningful things in the real world. G ö del had already explained it. The blockchain technology claims to solve the problem of centralization, and the blockchain based on BFT consensus is completely centralized. Class BFT consensus, using strong consistency to formalize mathematical logic, not only proves 100% certainty, but also effectively implements it. But the POS nodes participating in BFT verification are all centralized communication, and the faster the BFT consensus is confirmed, the more centralized it is, which is complete centralization at the code level. It is also the complete centralization of the formal system of "removing self referential", which has created the closed VM of the current blockchain technology platform. The VM platforms built by various blockchain technologies nowadays may seem capable of performing formal mathematical calculations, but they are meaningless. For example: The meaninglessness of tokens lies in the fact that they have no self and can only perform formal addition and subtraction. The Satoshi consensus of Bitcoin does not use mathematical logic to solve consistency problems, but instead uses intuitive logic to construct self referential recursive systems to include all the facts in the "liar paradox", that is, the undecidable probabilistic Satoshi consensus is complete. Mr. Dongguo and G ö del. Everyone has read Mr. Dongguo's story of "filling in the numbers with a flute", and the solution to the liar paradox, or the systematic approach that includes a self referential framework, is the method used in the story of "filling in the numbers with a flute". Use the observer's intuition to assess whether to lie or not/whether to fill in the number with the flute. The same answer is to solve the problem of filling the number with a bamboo flute and to solve the problem of incomplete mathematical logic formal system. This is also the way of G ö del's AI logic. It is also the only solution to creating a real/meaningful world. Bitcoin is not a blockchain technology that is just filling in numbers. People misunderstand that Bitcoin is a blockchain technology, Bitcoin is only named after Block and Chain in the code, not a formal blockchain technology based on quantity logic that we will see later. Bitcoin has solved the meaningless problem of constructing self referential recursive loops in mathematical logic formal systems by solving Mr. Dongguo's problem of "filling in numbers with incompetent instruments". What if Bitcoin solves the problem of self referential recursive loops and becomes meaningful? The miner with the longest chain in Bitcoin, when mining a new block, does not know if he is the longest chain. He broadcasts it out and seeks verification from a third-party miner to obtain feedback and prove whether he is the longest chain. Prove whether you are yourself. Because Satoshi Nakamoto cleverly used the observer mode to turn Bitcoin consensus into an undecidable probabilistic consensus, instead of pursuing meaningless formal deterministic consensus, it became a meaningful undecidable consensus. The authenticity of Bitcoin comes from this. Thousands of sails pass by the sunken ship's side/Ten thousand trees spring in front of the sick tree. The mathematical logic formalism of blockchain technology has delayed the industry for too long, it's time for us to set sail again. Mr. Dongguo gave us the answer, G ö del gave us the answer, and Hou Shida's GEB also gave us the answer. Satoshi Nakamoto even gave us the answer using the probabilistic intuition system Bitcoin, which constructs self referential recursive loops. We just don't study hard, but it's not too late. It's time for us to bid farewell to formal blockchain technology and embrace the meaningful and valuable new cryptocurrency industry.