Ask Berachain again: Avoiding the key and shifting the topic, why does the ecological project Enso remain silent on key issues After three consecutive rounds of questioning, Enso replied that Berachain was still as quiet as an old dog, quite awesome, and could be called the Terra Cotta Warriors of the blockchain era, focusing on one read, and then lying dead. However, Enso's response not only failed to dispel doubts, but also made things even more absurd. Let's first review my Q&A with Enso. My question is: If you are a reward under the RFA program, why did you withdraw your coins to Binance in the first place? Because according to the official document, 85% of the tokens you received should be distributed to mainnet and testnet users. So why do you have the authority not to execute these token distributions according to official requirements. Enso's response: We are the core infrastructure launched by Berachin, and the execution of $3.1 billion was carried out through our infrastructure. We were listed as an RFA project because we helped Berachin succeed. What does this answer reveal? I don't want to say words that are logically moving and can't roast. We will only talk about the facts behind the answers. If it weren't for my misunderstanding, Enso's words clearly indicate: 1、 Berachain's token allocation is not based on rules, but on privileges. 1) According to the rules, tokens from the RFA program should be allocated to real users on both the mainnet and testnet. 2) In reality, Enso directly bypasses the rules and withdraws coins to Binance as soon as possible. 2、 Enso claims to be part of the RFA program, but has not implemented the allocation rules of the RFA program 1) Since you are a member of the RFA plan, why not execute according to the RFA plan? 2) If Enso can dispose of these tokens at will, do the "rules" of the RFA plan really make sense? 3、 If Enso has the power to bypass rules, who granted this power? There are only two possibilities: 1) Either Berachain officially defaults to Enso doing this 2) Either Enso directly embezzled this money. In either case, it further exposes the serious opacity of Berachain token allocation. Contribution and compliance with rules are not the same thing at all. The attempt to deceive people by changing concepts only shows that this problem is even more serious than I imagined!!! Finally, what I want to say is that when a project dares not even defend its own rules, it shows that fairness has always been a facade. So, how long can Berachain hold on to this self grave digging game@ berachain @connor_enso