Why has' Binance Strict Selection 'become a bulletproof vest for' fraud projects' Perhaps our distance from evil is only one 'Binance Strict Selection', and the riots and curses in the Redstone project community have provided all the answers. If the project party only needs to pay enough listing fees, can they purchase legal robbery rights from Binance and deprive the community of countless efforts in an instant? Last night RedStone opened for airdrop collection, but within ten minutes, the community exploded with waves of condemnation, from the Chinese community to the English community. Counting carefully, the most common keyword in the community is "fraud", and the most common demand is "CZ and Binance should immediately remove this fraudulent project". What exactly did Redstone do to make the community so intense, focused on the following three points: 1. Rule fraud. During the years long project construction process, many users completed over hundreds of tasks, including various special tasks during holidays, while constantly hinting to users that completing tasks would earn points and there would be airdrops in the future. However, in the end, airdrop rules were given, and suddenly a so-called "special role" appeared, which qualified them. There had been no prompts before. 2. The mouse compartment exceeds the standard. According to community feedback, it is roughly estimated that over 98% of these loyal community participants are not eligible for airdrops, and many of them have participated in every task and activity. 3. The commitment has been significantly reduced. Previously, the project party claimed to give 10% to the community, but currently it is estimated to be less than 2%. According to incomplete statistics, only 4000 addresses received airdrops. Since the project party has already planned to stand on the opposite side of the community and kneel down to capital, the community's condemnation cannot awaken a project party without bottom lines and integrity. What we need to ask is, why did all of this happen after Redstone launched Binance? Is Binance Strict Selection a "sieve that strictly considers reputation, value, and traffic of good projects" or a "funnel that can achieve exemption from fraud projects as long as the protection fee is paid"? If every minute that retail investors stay up late to do tasks becomes a stepping stone for the project team when Binance rings the bell, and the community members harvested by Redstone are just traffic data and transaction fee fuel in Binance's eyes??? If the so-called "strict selection of Binance" has become the last refuge for malicious project parties, then is it difficult for your listing standards to be based on the standard of sharing the spoils?? When the project party blatantly and Binance does nothing, we are not afraid to question everything from the most malicious perspective. This is a desperate cry and also a call to place hope in Binance. Every fierce condemnation in the community is accompanied by countless blood and tears. Money can be earned without it, and under the same rules, we acknowledge it, but we will never tolerate fraud!!! Deeply unwilling, when we examine the development of the industry, we will be horrified to find that all harvesting sickles are stamped with Binance's steel seal, and we do not want all leek tombstones to be engraved with "Binance's Strict Selection". Binance, as an industry leader with the ability to change all of this, should not be inactive, indifferent, and even more so, should not assist the tyrant! I believe Binance is not a dragon, Binance is still the dragon slayer boy! @cz_binance @heyibinance