After Bybit was stolen this time, the cmETH contract directly snatched back 15000 ETH, and Teda's contract froze the U associated with the hacker's address. There was no such convenient tornado that allowed hackers to launder money smoothly. However, there were also several decentralized cross line bridges that were exchanged for a small amount of ETH by hackers. Due to the existence of these centralized backdoors, a large amount of stolen ETH could only be temporarily "locked in". Otherwise, the $1.5 billion ETH would directly support the general's construction of a great socialist society. Whenever this happens, everyone is grateful for centralization, and doubts arise about the necessity of the political correctness banner of anti censorship and decentralized spirit that crypto has always held high. After all, the vast majority of old... People really don't have such demand scenarios, and those who have demand have to admit that gray and black industries are the main ones, I believe that in Crypto, there is only one thing that needs to be completely decentralized, which is Bitcoin, which stores value. However, everything with other application scenarios does not need to be completely decentralized. For example, the National Security Agency of the United States previously required that all Defi protocol contracts must have a blacklist function. From the perspective of a small ordinary person like me, I support it. After all, why should I have the opportunity to be blacklisted by the FBI in the United States? On the contrary, I may be ruined by someone who has been blacklisted