data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4162f/4162f16af08c55573d63d23161c3a99d6e1a6f73" alt="Cos(余弦)😶🌫️"
Cos(余弦)😶🌫️|Feb 22, 2025 03:37
The Safe contract is fine, but the problem lies in the non contract part, where the front-end has been tampered with and forged to achieve a deceptive effect. This is not an isolated case. North Korean hackers took down several companies last year, such as:
-WazirX 230M Safe Multi Sign
-Radiant Capital 50M Sade signed multiple contracts
-DMM 305M Gonco signed multiple contracts
This attack technique is engineered and mature, truly powerful. Other companies also need to pay more attention, as signing multiple contracts may not be the only type of attack point in Safe.
Share To
Timeline
HotFlash
APP
X
Telegram
CopyLink