In fact, Gracy's controversial tweet stems from the transition of the cryptocurrency industry from the first generation of grassroots entrepreneurs to professional managers. Like Old Xu@ CZ_Sinance, the first generation born in the wilderness, would not have been able to make a bloody path to where they are now if they did not have a firm belief in cryptocurrency that is unimaginable to ordinary people and a profound understanding of human nature (gambling). In the early years, Star's most famous nickname was "Nurse Xu" because he was particularly good at contract stitching, but the reason why so many people still played it was because the OKX contract depth and user operation were good on the product at that time. I don't know if he plays the contract himself, but he definitely understands. But in these two cycles, some professional managers began to join the industry as new blood. They may be crypto friendly, but more often than not, they just see crypto as a business/job. It's better to expect them to have faith in crypto. Originally, the logic that 'those who discover opportunities in the casino business must be gamblers, but the managers who make the casino bigger may not gamble themselves' is reluctantly valid. But Gracy's biggest problem is that she loves to talk and enjoys the feeling under the spotlight. Previously, there was already a lot of criticism for advising people not to buy Bitcoin, but this time, @ bitgetglobal's insistence on saying 'no one should be a gambler' despite relying on memes and contracts to make a living is a bit reckless and glaring. If the contract and Meme cannot be removed, and only trading "assets that make people sleep" is provided, then to put it bluntly, what is the difference between this and persuading the young lady to quit after finishing the pleasure and putting on her pants?