data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31cec/31cecb81a24b13820d3eb89d65f019b58fc9bd62" alt="Zolo 🌊 🧩"
Zolo 🌊 🧩|Feb 15, 2025 15:47
In order to make community operations "decentralized" and "DAO", although listening to the voices of the community is a good thing, many times, the community will also provide a lot of "noise" feedback, which greatly reduces work efficiency.
@ dankvr from @ ai16zdao thinks very well about the community.
Overall, it is important to evaluate the weight of feedback based on contributions in order to operate communities more fairly and sustainably.
such as
one ️⃣ Contribution based reputation system
two ️⃣ A voting weight model based on workload exchange
If anyone could make such a tool, that would be great. Here are some key points:
1. Contribution based reputation system
-On chain contribution tracking: Use verifiable logs (GitHub submissions, forum posts, votes, governance proposals, etc.) to measure actual work.
-Decay over time: If someone stops contributing, their reputation should decay to ensure that active members maintain their influence.
2. Second round voting/fund allocation
-Prioritize decision-making and resource allocation based on strengths rather than the number of complaints.
-The second round of voting allows active contributors to have greater say, rather than being dominated by big players.
-Traceability of public goods funding rewards past work, not just promises.
3. Voting Model for Proof of Work Exchange
-Require proof of work before voting or making decisions - based on contribution governance, rather than one token per vote.
-Optimistic governance: Only those who actively build/maintain the system can decide or propose changes.
4. Automatically balance workload and rewards
-Tools such as Coordinape/SourceCred algorithms measure/allocate rewards based on peer recognition.
-Anti fatigue cooling off period: allowing contributors to rest without losing their status.
5. Community culture and norms
-Public contribution dashboard (transparency can suppress free riding behavior).
-Rotating leadership positions to prevent excessive burden on the same person.
-Structured feedback loop, complaints must be accompanied by solutions.
Really good thought!
Share To
HotFlash
APP
X
Telegram
CopyLink