data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f500/7f500154fd4ddd2f29273b7488edb93029ae77f4" alt="Patrick Hansen"
Patrick Hansen|Feb 14, 2025 11:10
๐ช๐บ ๐๐ ๐
๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ฌ ๐ฏ๐ฌ. ๐บ๐ธ ๐๐ ๐
๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ฌ: ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ฌ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฉ!
A new ESMA report (link in comments) gives valuable insights:
โ
US funds dominate global markets with 50% of net assets, while the EU holds 30%.
โ
Retail investors hold 88% of US funds, but only 65% in EU UCITS & 11.3% in AIFs.
โ
Fund size matters. US share classes average โฌ810M, while EU funds are much smaller (โฌ320M/fund).
โ
Lower Costs in the US:
US equity funds avg. 0.44%, EU 1.40%
US bond funds avg. 0.37%, EU 0.86%
โ
ETF dominance. Passive investing leads in the US, while EU ETFs are growing but still relatively small (16% of UCITS market).
๐๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง? ๐๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ ๐๐ซ & ๐๐ก๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ซโ๐๐ฒ ๐ ๐ฅ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ญ.
The cheapest ETFs in the U.S. charge ~0.03% fees annually. Good luck finding those in the EU.
Meanwhile, most EU pension systems are broken (no need to sugarcoat it). Private retirement savings through capital markets must be made easier, cheaper, and more accessible. Fast!
What we need in my opinion:
โ
Larger funds & economies of scale โ Support mergers, institutional participation & cross-border consolidation (EU capital markets union?)
โ
Educate & promote passive investing โ Too many EU investors overpay for active funds sold by commission-driven bank advisors.
โ
Better distribution โ Cut out the middleman. Encourage direct sales models like 401(k)-style retirement plans.
โ
Reduce regulatory burden โ Simplify disclosure, distribution, and compliance costs.
The gap is real and we need to close it, fast.
Share To
Timeline
HotFlash
APP
X
Telegram
CopyLink