✍️ Trapped in a whirlpool of public opinion, can Kaito save himself? I have to say@_ Kaitoai is a phenomenal product, and those who like it are already crazy, tirelessly posting, interacting, and checking scores. Those who don't like it are already crazy, criticizing and blacklisting Yappers. As one of the earliest bloggers in the Chinese section to promote Kaito+minting NFTs, I am actually a little tired of it because Kaito is a bit off track now, and many people are yaping for yap, leading to rampant issues such as information harassment and false inducement, seriously polluting the Twitter timeline. In the past few days, I have mainly been doing two things: ① pouring cold water on the wrong posture of newcomers and guiding everyone to focus on the Kaito project; ② Give advice to the authorities and take action on the problems currently exposed, don't wait for the old horse to take action. Click here to view the original text: https://(x.com)/wenxue600/status/1888385407827788243 It's interesting that I gave the official key feedback on 3 issues, of which 2 are already in progress. This wave must be liked by the official: ① Content quality issue: upcoming shadow ban On the morning of February 9th, I quoted a netizen's "Against Kaito" to bluntly state the current chaos of malicious farms, frequent harassment, and false inducement in Kaito. At noon that day, founder @ Punk9277 tweeted that after listening to community feedback, an algorithm based shadow ban would soon be implemented to crack down on low-quality interactive content. Real users applaud this and everyone understands. ② NFT empowerment issue: DC authentication+voting weighting Kaito Creation NFT has been on sale for several months now, and although the floor price is very strong, there is almost no official empowerment. Finally, yesterday, the official action was taken. First, DC authentication was opened up, allowing holders to obtain the prestigious Genesis Holder identity. Then, a very large Connect voting weight was given (holders need to manually bind their wallets). Currently, the number of votes for one NFT exceeds 130000. This means that if the project party wants to succeed in the election, it is simpler and rougher to purchase NFTs or unite holders. In addition to the above two issues, I also provided feedback and suggestions regarding the voting activity. In a simple overview, at present, Connect has no presence, social media discussions are very low, many projects have not been actively promoted (possibly related to the Spring Festival?), and the information is very opaque, with the entire process being chaotic and disorderly. My suggestion is to add a voting incentive section, allowing each project to announce the conditions for "bribery" in advance, so that everyone can vote with their feet on the premise of fully understanding the information, and it can be traced afterwards. Currently, there has been no response. In addition to this, I have some new ideas for @ Punk9277 to refer to: ① Can a margin mechanism be introduced: all projects must pay a portion of the margin to participate in PK, and once they win, voters will share the margin (which can be U or future tokens) ② Can we introduce a voting destruction mechanism: Extreme Game, where all Yap votes are destroyed, equivalent to exchanging Yap for project tokens, provided that the project party provides a clear airdrop Finally, everyone is welcome to discuss the issues with Kaito in the comments section. It would be even better if there were any constructive suggestions. I will review each message and select some serious replies. @StoryProtocol @monad_xyz @EclipseFND @initia @0G_labs @tradeparadex @use_corn @QuaiNetwork @movementlabsxyz @burnt_xion @megaeth_labs