Today, I followed the trend and learned by @ dr_andrewlaw @Tribedotrun noticed that many friends on Twitter are here. Learning is one aspect, and on the other hand, I heard from Andrew that there may be opportunities for airdrops, so the actuary started going online. To be honest, the UI interface is not very pleasing. When it comes to the style of Win95, it is highly praised, almost like the system of Win3.0. I have seen this style on Curve before, and this time it is a nostalgic style. However, in terms of returning to its essence, Tribe is almost no different from the previous Friendtech. They both create their own characters and let users buy and sell them. All communication methods are in the chat window, and it can't be said to be anything serious. When I was at Friendtech, I said that it was too difficult to transfer traffic from Twitter to private domain, and users' habits were difficult to change. So far, Tribe has not fundamentally changed, just moved from ETH to SOL, so this model may not be able to take a different path from Friendtech. So the current participation is partly based on Imran's recommendations, after all, he has too many successful works, and everyone hopes that he can have a breakthrough point in the end. Secondly, there is currently no good SocialFi on Solana, and in fact, there are not many players in the entire industry who can make a big difference. The reason why they cannot make a big difference is that, like Friendtech, private domain traffic is difficult to maintain. So when users return to Twitter, this SocialFi becomes a mess. Of course, this is based on the concept of SocialFi. If we use the concept of Meme, it may be different. It's like everyone posting their own Meme and asking everyone to subscribe. However, this also has a problem, just like Friendtech, which is that when there is not enough liquidity, your price will continue to decline. In a sense, it's like 'cutting' your users. Of course, this is not subjective, but it actually happens. For example, what I can do is to buy as much liquidity as possible to help my friends exit. But it's still a drop in the bucket. Early purchases were mostly robots, and then they withdrew based on similar returns. The slight difference is that I can airdrop my own shares to members, which is completely different from Friendtech. I think the project team wants to use airdrops to maintain the relationship between members. For example, if I buy Andrew's shares, I can airdrop them to all of my members, and if I buy my own shares, I can also airdrop them to my members. Even I can import external tokens to airdrop to members, but to be honest, this feature looks a bit interesting, but in reality, what kind of airdrop can it really give? Moreover, airdrops are basically just wool on sheep. So from my own experience, the significance of participating is not significant, mainly because there is no essential difference between it and Friendtech. If new content is added in the future, you can take a look. Currently, it is still the gameplay of buying and selling friends in the "Happy Farm". During our conversation with Andrew earlier, I also pointed out that the interaction here is almost meaningless. However, if mining can be done through interaction, it may be slightly different. Otherwise, it is essentially a product of "mutual cutting". Experience Portal: https://www.tribe.run/join/41fa9a This tweet is sponsored by @ ApeXProtocolCN | Dex With Apex