One reason why @aixbt_agent is able to maintain dominance is that it has established an attention flywheel People see AIXBT create attention for projects -> projects/investors engage AIXBT to get it to talk about their projects -> X algorithm boosts AIXBT posts due to engagement -> infinite loop The mid curve take is that AIXBT can be fed bad data but it’s solved by implementing a quality control system Once a human <> AIXBT <> agent feedback system is in place then very soon the terminal outputs will be as good as top human research analysts. A role that funds/investors would usually pay 100-500k/year for