The "centralization" and "decentralization" of Chinese history seem to be a pendulum.

CN
Lanli
Follow
6 hours ago

The "centralization" and "decentralization" in Chinese history seem to be a pendulum, but overall, it has swung towards a more centralized model.

The benefits of decentralization are relatively stable, as seen in the Zhou and Han dynasties, which lasted for hundreds of years. Even the Song dynasty was able to persist for nearly a century in the face of the once-in-a-thousand-years monster that was the Mongols.

In earlier ancient times, centralization lacked systemic support and sufficient supporting classes (such as small landowners and scholars), which is why centralization often proved to be relatively short-lived (like the Qin and early Tang dynasties).

This is also another form of "long division must unite, long unification must divide," essentially a result of the tug-of-war between scale effects (centralized unification) and the power law of wealth and knowledge (aristocratic families vs. small landowners).

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

派网:注册并领取高达10000 USDT
Ad
Share To
APP

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink