This time, Binance's voting for delisting coins—

$GPS almost carried all the firepower;

I want to know what everyone thinks?

I feel there are still some unfair aspects:

Many of the coins being delisted are old coins that have already lost their popularity, but many of our friends have lost money on GPS and can't find an outlet for their frustration, so they vote for it without thinking. Therefore, I see this wave of GPS as being in the center of the firepower;

Is this right?

It's both right and wrong!

The right part is that everyone has emotions; people need to vent, and they feel uncomfortable because of their losses. I am one of them; I am also in a losing state, so I naturally understand this feeling;

The wrong part is that when I think about it, I still want to break even. Binance's voting for delisting directly allows us to vote for a moment of satisfaction, but after voting, the hope of breaking even is gone. If this continues, will I be hurt even more?

Voting for a coin to be listed is because I believe in the community and core of that coin, the founder's style, and the project's concept, which I like, so I vote!

However, voting for a coin to be delisted probably has only one reason: because it made me lose money, so I vote for it;

Whether this is fair or not is still up for consideration!

Below is the repurchase explanation given by Goplus @GoPlusSecurity,

I think it is still sincere.

If the project party is deceiving, there is no need to take out an additional 2 million dollars, and it's very easy to verify. The process of Kyb has a traceable procedure; I suggest the project party directly show the process you went through to handle this.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。