On March 12, 2025, coinciding with the fifth anniversary of the infamous "312 Incident" in cryptocurrency history, the global crypto market once again faced a disturbing widespread downturn. Bitcoin (BTC) prices fell below $80,000, Ethereum (ETH) dipped below $2,000, and the total market capitalization shrank to $2.7 trillion. Meanwhile, on-chain liquidation amounts exceeded $120 million, panic spread rapidly, and investors couldn't help but ask: Is this a historical reenactment of the "312 tragedy," or a signal that the crypto market is entering a new cycle?

![Fifth Anniversary of the "312 Incident": Crypto Market Faces Widespread Downturn Again: Historical Reenactment or the Beginning of a New Cycle?aicoinImage1](https://static.aicoinstorge.com/article/20250312/174174622797374.png "Fifth Anniversary of the "312 Incident": Crypto Market Faces Widespread Downturn Again: Historical Reenactment or the Beginning of a New Cycle?aicoinImage1")

Fifth Anniversary of the "312 Incident": The "Dark Day" of the Crypto Market

To understand the current downturn, we first need to revisit the "312 Incident" from five years ago. On March 12, 2020, influenced by the global outbreak of COVID-19 and panic selling in financial markets, the cryptocurrency market experienced an unprecedented crash. On that day, Bitcoin's price plummeted from around $7,300 to $3,800, a drop of over 50%, while Ethereum hit a low of $80. On-chain data showed that liquidation amounts reached as high as $1.4 billion within 24 hours, leaving many leveraged investors with nothing. This event not only led to a collapse of market confidence but also exposed the vulnerabilities of the crypto ecosystem at the time, such as MakerDAO nearly collapsing due to bad debt issues.

The "312 Incident" is seen as a watershed moment for the crypto market. Prior to this, the crypto industry was still in a phase of wild growth, with investors lacking awareness of risks and high-leverage trading being prevalent. However, after the crash, the market gradually matured, with institutional entry, stricter regulations, and the rise of decentralized finance (DeFi) becoming the main themes of subsequent development. Yet, five years later, the crypto market has not completely escaped the fate of cyclical fluctuations, and the downturn in March 2025 seems to evoke a sense of history once again.

Current Market: Triggers for the Widespread Downturn and Data Analysis

In March 2025, signs of fatigue began to show in the crypto market. According to AiCoin data, Bitcoin fell about 10% within 24 hours, Ethereum dropped nearly 15%, and other major cryptocurrencies like Solana (SOL) and Binance Coin (BNB) were also not spared. On-chain data indicated that over $120 million in leveraged positions were liquidated, affecting more than 100,000 investors. Meanwhile, the Fear and Greed Index fell into the "extreme fear" zone, reflecting a severe blow to market confidence.

![Fifth Anniversary of the "312 Incident": Crypto Market Faces Widespread Downturn Again: Historical Reenactment or the Beginning of a New Cycle?aicoinImage2](https://static.aicoinstorge.com/article/20250312/174174582733004.png "Fifth Anniversary of the "312 Incident": Crypto Market Faces Widespread Downturn Again: Historical Reenactment or the Beginning of a New Cycle?aicoinImage2")

The trigger for this downturn is not a single event but rather the result of multiple overlapping factors:

Increased Concerns Over U.S. Economic Recession

Recently, the U.S. stock market has experienced significant volatility due to a reduced probability of interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve in March. The Nasdaq and S&P 500 indices fell by 5% and 4%, respectively, over the past week, and panic quickly spread to the risk asset market. As a highly correlated asset to traditional financial markets, cryptocurrencies were also affected. Additionally, rumors about updates to the U.S. stablecoin legislation and a potential executive order on crypto from Trump have introduced policy uncertainties to the market.

![Fifth Anniversary of the "312 Incident": Crypto Market Faces Widespread Downturn Again: Historical Reenactment or the Beginning of a New Cycle?aicoinImage3](https://static.aicoinstorge.com/article/20250312/174174644642892.png "Fifth Anniversary of the "312 Incident": Crypto Market Faces Widespread Downturn Again: Historical Reenactment or the Beginning of a New Cycle?aicoinImage3")

Abnormal On-Chain Fund Flows

Data shows that cryptocurrency ETFs have recently experienced capital outflows, large amounts of Bitcoin have been transferred from Mt. Gox-related addresses, and news of MakerDAO whales nearing liquidation has put direct pressure on the market. The decline in on-chain activity for Solana also indicates that some high-risk projects may face the risk of a funding chain break. Compared to the "312 Incident," the magnitude of this downturn has not reached the extreme levels of that year, but the scale of on-chain liquidations and market panic is enough to raise alarms. Analysts point out that while the current market leverage is lower than in 2020, the participation of institutional investors is higher, which may amplify the chain reaction of the downturn.

Market Response: Panic and Opportunity Coexist

In the face of a widespread downturn, the reactions of the crypto community and investors have been polarized. On one hand, social media is filled with concerns about "historical reenactment." On platform X, some users recall the "310 tragedy" (the continuous circuit breaker and crash from March 10 to 12, 2020), lamenting, "It's like reliving the dark moments of five years ago." On the other hand, some seasoned investors believe this could be a good opportunity to buy the dip. An anonymous analyst posted on X, stating, "The Fear and Greed Index shows extreme fear; this is the time to position."

At the institutional level, the response is equally complex. Some hedge funds choose to reduce their positions and wait, while others begin to accumulate at lower levels. According to Glassnode data, the number of addresses holding over 1,000 Bitcoins has slightly increased in the past 24 hours, indicating that "whales" are buying the dip. However, retail investors, due to panic selling and high-leverage liquidations, have generally become the biggest victims of this downturn.

It is worth noting that the DeFi ecosystem has shown a certain degree of resilience during this downturn. Although the Total Value Locked (TVL) has decreased, major protocols have not experienced systemic risks similar to MakerDAO in 2020. This may be attributed to advancements in technology and risk management in DeFi over the past five years.

Historical Comparison: Similarities and Differences Between This Downturn and the "312 Incident"

Although the current market situation bears striking similarities to the "312 Incident" in terms of timing and market sentiment, there are both commonalities and significant differences between the two from multiple perspectives. Here is a detailed analysis of the comparison:

1. Macroeconomic Background: Global Crisis vs. Economic Expectations

• "312 Incident": The crash in 2020 occurred at the onset of the global COVID-19 pandemic. At that time, traditional financial markets collapsed due to lockdowns and uncertainties caused by the pandemic, with U.S. stocks experiencing multiple circuit breakers and commodities like gold and oil falling simultaneously. The crypto market, as a "magnifying glass" for risk assets, was severely impacted against the backdrop of global liquidity drying up.
• 2025 Downturn: The macro background for this downturn is not a sudden global crisis but rather a combination of rising expectations of a U.S. economic recession and geopolitical tensions. The continuation of the Federal Reserve's interest rate hike cycle, the uncertainty surrounding the Russia-Ukraine situation, and cyberattack incidents on social media platform X collectively form pressure sources for risk assets. Compared to 2020, the current macro environment is not optimistic but has not reached the extreme state of "global standstill" seen that year.

Similarities and Differences: Both downturns are influenced by macroeconomic factors, but the "312 Incident" was triggered by a sudden public health crisis, while the 2025 downturn resembles a concentrated release of multiple chronic pressures.

2. Market Structure: Retail Dominance vs. Institutional Participation

• "312 Incident": In 2020, the crypto market was still predominantly retail-driven, with low participation from institutional investors. High-leverage trading was extremely common at that time, with many retail investors amplifying their positions through lending platforms, leading to a rapid expansion of liquidation scales during the crash. The market's lack of liquidity and depth exacerbated the price's violent fluctuations.
• 2025 Downturn: Five years later, the structure of participants in the crypto market has undergone profound changes. Institutional investors have become significant players through ETFs, hedge funds, and corporate holdings (such as MicroStrategy). Glassnode data shows that the current market leverage is lower than in 2020, but the liquidity and trading behavior of institutional funds have a more pronounced impact on prices. In this downturn, ETF capital outflows and "whale" sell-offs have become key variables.

Similarities and Differences: Both downturns are accompanied by liquidation waves, but the "312 Incident" was more a result of retail leverage collapse, while the 2025 downturn is influenced by both institutional behavior and market maturity.

3. Technical Ecosystem: Vulnerability Exposure vs. Resilience Improvement

• "312 Incident": The crash in 2020 exposed the vulnerabilities of the blockchain ecosystem at that time. For example, the rapid decline in ETH prices led to insufficient collateral for MakerDAO, and the system failed to liquidate in time, resulting in millions of dollars in bad debt. The Ethereum network also nearly collapsed due to high gas fees and congestion, revealing the experimental nature of early DeFi.
• 2025 Downturn: In contrast, the DeFi ecosystem has demonstrated greater stability during this downturn. Although TVL has decreased, major protocols (such as Aave and Uniswap) have not faced systemic risks. The maturity of Ethereum Layer 2 solutions and cross-chain technologies has allowed the network to perform more steadily in high-volatility environments.

Similarities and Differences: Both events tested blockchain technology, but the "312 Incident" was a concentrated exposure of technical flaws, while the 2025 downturn is more about funding flow issues, with technology not being a major drag.

4. Magnitude of Decline and Liquidation Scale: Extreme Crash vs. Moderate Adjustment

• "312 Incident": On that day, Bitcoin's decline exceeded 50%, Ethereum's decline approached 60%, and the liquidation amount reached $1.4 billion within 24 hours. This extreme volatility is extremely rare in crypto history and directly led to a large number of accounts being wiped out.
• 2025 Downturn: In this downturn, Bitcoin's decline was about 10%, Ethereum's decline was 15%, and the liquidation amount was $120 million. Although panic sentiment is significant, the magnitude of the decline and liquidation scale has not reached the levels of the "312 Incident," reflecting more of a severe market adjustment.

Similarities and Differences: Both downturns triggered liquidation waves, but the extremity of the "312 Incident" far exceeds the current situation, and the market response in 2025 resembles a more orderly release of risk.

5. Market Sentiment and Social Feedback: Despair vs. Polarization

• "312 Incident": The crash in 2020 triggered widespread despair in the community. Social media was filled with rhetoric about "crypto is dead," and many investors completely exited the market, with confidence taking months to recover.
• 2025 Downturn: In this downturn, market sentiment has shown polarization. On platform X, there are both pessimistic comments about "historical reenactment" and optimistic voices about "buying opportunities." The low-level accumulation by institutions and "whales" further indicates that the market has not fallen into complete despair.

Similarities and Differences: Both events are accompanied by panic, but the sentiment after the "312 Incident" was more uniformly pessimistic, while 2025 shows a maturity and differentiation in investor mindset.

6. External Interconnectivity: Isolated Market vs. High Correlation

• "312 Incident": In 2020, the correlation between the crypto market and traditional finance was relatively low, driven more by internal leverage and panic. Although the stock market circuit breaker was the trigger, the collapse of the crypto market was more of an independent event.
• 2025 Downturn: Now, the interconnectivity of crypto assets with traditional markets has significantly increased. The declines in the Nasdaq and S&P 500 directly dragged down BTC and ETH, and ETF fund flows have become an important indicator for observing the market.

Similarities and Differences: Both downturns were influenced by external markets, but during the "312 Incident," the independence of the crypto market was stronger, while the 2025 downturn reflects its deep embedding as a global risk asset.

Conclusion: History is a Mirror, the Future is Yet to be Written

On the fifth anniversary of the "312 Incident," the widespread downturn in the crypto market undoubtedly serves as a wake-up call for investors. From macro background to technical ecosystem, from market structure to emotional response, this downturn shares similarities with the "312 Incident," while also presenting unique characteristics due to the evolution of the industry over the past five years. It reminds us that although the crypto market has made significant progress in maturity, resilience, and participant diversity, cyclical fluctuations and external risks remain realities that cannot be ignored. History is a mirror, and the chapters of the future still need to be written amidst turbulence and opportunity.

AiCoin Official Website: www.aicoin.com

Telegram: t.me/aicoincn

Twitter: x.com/AiCoinzh

Email: support@aicoin.com

Group Chat: Customer Service Yingying、Customer Service KK

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。