The Pectra upgrade will significantly enhance staking efficiency, driving ETH valuation towards income-generating assets, but concerns about staking centralization and competition with rivals remain.

Written by: Lawrence

I. Lightning Decisions Amid a Technical Crisis: Holesky Testnet Downtime and Community Consensus Reconstruction

1. A Technical Failure of "Non-War Crimes"

On February 24, 2025, the key testnet Holesky for Ethereum's Pectra upgrade experienced a severe interruption, leading to widespread validator node disconnections and halted block synchronization. Although the incident was unrelated to Pectra's core protocol and was caused by configuration conflicts in client software (such as Geth and Lighthouse), its destructive impact exceeded expectations—testing originally scheduled for early March was forced to be postponed until the end of the month, directly disrupting the development roadmap. This incident exposed the vulnerability of Ethereum's multi-client architecture: what seemed like a redundant design became an amplifier of systemic risk in extreme scenarios.

2. Shadow Fork: "Surgical" Fixes in Crisis

To catch up on progress, on the evening of March 6, the Ethereum Foundation and core developers urgently initiated a "shadow fork" of Holesky. This plan involved copying the mainnet state to an independent chain, allowing developers to verify fixes in an isolated environment without affecting the recovery process of the main testnet. This strategy had been successfully applied during the 2023 Merge upgrade, but this fork was more challenging: it needed to maintain compatibility with future Fusaka upgrade testing while fixing vulnerabilities. The community rarely reached a consensus—temporarily tolerating technical debt to prioritize the timely launch of Pectra.

3. The "Unexpected Gain" of the Failure: Extreme Stress Testing of the Staking Mechanism

The Holesky interruption unexpectedly became a "stress test" for the staking mechanism. Testnet data showed that when more than 15% of validator nodes went offline, the automated execution efficiency of network penalties (slashing) dropped by 40%, exposing governance blind spots in large-scale staking scenarios. This finding prompted developers to accelerate the integration testing of EIP-7251 (raising the single validator staking cap to 2048 ETH) and EIP-7002 (triggering exits at the execution layer), paving the way for ETF-level funds.

II. The "Arms Race" in the Staking Arena: ETF Compliance and Institutional Capital Positioning

1. SEC's "Green Light" Signal: The Compliance Game Between 21Shares and Grayscale

In February 2025, the SEC received amendment applications for Ethereum ETF staking from 21Shares and Grayscale. Unlike earlier proposals, the new plan avoids regulatory risks through "non-custodial staking"—assets are held by compliant custodians like Coinbase, and profit distribution is automatically settled via smart contracts, avoiding fund pool commingling. The SEC's feedback documents indicated a shift in attitude from "staking is a security" to "conditional compliance," requiring issuers to establish risk reserves (e.g., 2% of managed scale) to address forfeiture losses.

2. The "Death Line" of Yield: The Covert Logic of ETF Issuers

According to Bitwise calculations, if the U.S. Ethereum ETF enables staking, the annual yield could reach 3.2%-4.5%, nearly offsetting management fees of 0.25%-0.4%. To capture market share, giants like BlackRock and Fidelity are negotiating with Coinbase and Figment to reduce staking service fees to below 8% of yields (current market price is about 12%).

Meanwhile, Grayscale is taking a different approach by proposing a rule change at the New York Stock Exchange, allowing its Ethereum Trust (ETHE) to participate directly in staking, reducing intermediary cuts—if successful, the outflow of funds may reverse (ETHE recently lost $4 billion).

3. The "Counterattack" of Liquid Staking: Lido's Compliance Transformation and stETH Dominance

In the face of ETF competition, Lido urgently launched the V3 upgrade, introducing institutional customized products called stVaults: allowing ETF issuers to create independent staking pools, with node operators designated by institutions like BlackRock, and profits distributed after verification through zero-knowledge proofs (ZK Proof). This plan meets the SEC's transparency requirements while retaining Lido's liquidity advantage (stETH holds a 35% market share). Analysts predict that mainstream ETFs may adopt a "50% native staking + 50% stETH" mixed model, balancing yield and liquidity.

III. Token Economic Reconstruction: From Technical Upgrades to a $10 Billion Capital Siphoning Effect

1. The "Atomic Bomb-Level" Benefit of the Pectra Upgrade: Staking Throughput Soars 64 Times

Renowned analyst Max stated that the certainty of staking/un-staking time is key to the normal operation of capital markets, and the current dynamic queuing in Ethereum is not favorable.

The implementation of EIP-7251 will completely rewrite staking rules—the single validator staking cap will increase from 32 ETH to 2048 ETH, causing staking/un-staking queue throughput to surge 64 times. For ETFs, this means:

• Efficiency of Fund Entry: The entry time for $8 billion (4 million ETH) will be compressed from 69 days to 1.08 days;
• Crisis Exit Resolution: In extreme redemption scenarios, the 34-day queuing period will be shortened to 10 hours.
• This move directly dismantles the SEC's concerns about liquidity risk, clearing the largest obstacle for ETF approval.

2. The "Powder Keg" of Supply-Demand Imbalance: Staking Lockup and Deflationary Spiral

Dune data shows that the current circulating supply of Ethereum is about 120 million coins, with a staking rate of 27.64%. If ETF staking is approved, the staking rate is expected to rise to 50%, combined with the existing lockup from protocols like Lido, the actual circulating supply will decrease by over 20%. Meanwhile, the Pectra upgrade will introduce EIP-7623 to lower storage costs, driving up Gas fee consumption—annual inflation may shift from 0.5% to a net deflation of 1.2%.

Historical data indicates that for every 1% increase in staking rate, the coin price rises by 0.7%.

3. The "Critical Point" of Institutional FOMO: Countdown to $19 Billion Incremental Capital

Currently, the managed scale of U.S. Ethereum ETFs is only 52% of Bitcoin ETFs, primarily constrained by the lack of staking functionality. After the Pectra upgrade, analysts estimate that compliant staking ETFs will attract $19 billion in incremental capital (about 800,000 ETH), pushing the ETH/BTC market cap ratio from 15% to 30%. More critically, staking yields (3%-4.5%) will shift ETH away from the "digital commodity" valuation framework towards an income-generating asset model—if benchmarked against the S&P 500's 15 times PE, ETH's reasonable price will exceed $6,000.

IV. Risk Warnings: The "Unexploded Bomb" Beneath the Upgrade Dividend

1. The "Regulatory Tightening" of Staking Centralization

EIP-7251 may accelerate the centralization of node operators (such as Lido and Coinbase). The SEC has hinted at possibly setting a "20% share limit," and if exceeded, will require ETFs to enforce the diversification of staking service providers. This could trigger market panic selling of Lido (its token LDO's valuation relies 30% on institutional expectations).

2. The "Nuclear Button" of Profit Taking After the Upgrade

After the Pectra launch, early stakers (with costs around $1,500) could face potential selling pressure of $6 billion. However, on-chain data shows that over 70% of staked ETH is controlled by long-term holders, and institutions like BlackRock have committed to "locking up for at least 6 months," making short-term selling pressure manageable.

V. Conclusion: The Trio of Technology, Regulation, and Capital

The Holesky downtime incident unexpectedly became a pivotal turning point in Ethereum's evolution—it forced the community to confront governance challenges of large-scale staking and birthed EIP-7251 as an "ETF adapter." As the SEC gradually clears regulatory reefs around staking, Ethereum is transforming from a "developer paradise" into an "institutional-grade income-generating asset," and its valuation logic will be completely reconstructed.

In the short term, the Pectra upgrade and ETF approvals will create a "Davis Double-Whammy," pushing ETH to break $3,000 in Q2 2025; in the long term, the combination of staking yields and deflationary mechanisms may bring its market cap close to 40% of Bitcoin's within 5 years.

However, the essence of this transformation is Ethereum's "institutionalization" compromise—the future challenge will no longer be limited to code but will be about finding a new balance between decentralization and financial compliance.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。