Surface-level efforts and grand narratives can no longer support the true future of Ethereum.

In March 2025, the Ethereum Foundation (hereinafter referred to as EF) announced a significant leadership change: Executive Director Aya Miyaguchi stepped down from daily management responsibilities to become the Foundation's Chair. Meanwhile, Hsiao-Wei Wang and Tomasz Stańczak were appointed as the new co-executive directors, and the return of former EF researcher Danny Ryan was met with cheers from the community.

This personnel adjustment, combined with the ETH price closely monitored by the market and the Foundation's recent prominence in discussions, resembles a game about the future direction of Ethereum. From intense community debates to leadership changes, this story of power transition is also driven by market forces and expectations.

From Executive Director to Chair: A Promotion or a Demotion?

After serving as Executive Director for seven years, the controversial Aya Miyaguchi was promoted to Chair of the EF. While this appears to be an upgrade, from the perspective of power distribution, this change might be more accurately described as a “promotion in name only”. The position of Executive Director, which involves practical work, has been assigned to two individuals, Wang and Stanczak, who are more connected to the technical community. Aya's new role as Chair seems more like a symbolic representative (or mascot) of the Foundation, which may align better with her own working style.

In 2018, when Aya Miyaguchi took over as EF Executive Director, she focused on building a more “non-profit and sustainable” future for Ethereum. With an idealistic vision, Aya defined Ethereum as an “infinite garden,” encouraging developers to innovate freely in an open, permissionless ecosystem. The Devcon conference she promoted has become an annual celebration for the global Ethereum community.

(For further reading: From High School Teacher to Ethereum Foundation Chair, Aya and Her Infinite Garden)

However, an overly idealistic vision and working style may not meet the community's expectations for the Foundation's future. Until last year, dissatisfaction with her leadership style grew within the community, with some believing she was too conservative in resource allocation. In the face of continuous innovations from Solana, Ethereum's response seemed sluggish. At that time, as Executive Director, Aya focused more on cultural promotion rather than technical breakthroughs and market operations. Coupled with ongoing news of EF selling ETH amidst poor price performance, many developers and investors felt that EF was gradually becoming “unworthy of its position.” The community's debates intensified, leading to extreme comments and even death threats directed at her, prompting Vitalik to call for calm within the community.

Now, as Chair, Aya will focus on strategic guidance and external collaboration, marking the end of her practical execution years.

Hsiao-Wei Wang: Early Core Researcher, Bridging Community and Technology

**One of the new Executive Directors, Hsiao-Wei Wang, is known in Chinese as *王筱薇.*

Unlike Aya, Hsiao-Wei Wang's story began at the intersection of code and community. In 2017, she joined EF as a core researcher, quickly becoming a key figure in Ethereum core development, thanks to her technical background with a master's degree in network engineering from National Chiao Tung University in Taiwan. Her expertise focuses on sharding and the beacon chain, playing a crucial role in The Merge in 2022.

In 2018, she organized and participated in the Ethereum Sharding Workshop in Taipei, attracting global developers. This event showcased the Asia-Pacific Ethereum community and helped her build a reputation for balancing technical skills and communication. She has traveled extensively across Asia, hosting developer meetups and breaking down complex technical principles to connect with the community's understanding. She recalled, “That was our first time truly bringing the global R&D team to the local scene; the atmosphere was fantastic.”

Dr. Dong, founder of Celer Network, praised Hsiao-Wei Wang, stating that during 2018-2019, Wang worked with Ken, now head of the Uniswap Foundation, on EF's Grant program, being proactive and effective. Wang is well aware of the capabilities of Asian builders and has advocated for many Asian/Chinese builders, demonstrating a pragmatic approach.

Now, as Executive Director, Wang takes on the dual responsibilities of research insights and community building, and her arrival is seen as a signal for Ethereum to regain its technical and grassroots spirit.

Tomasz Stanczak: Architect of Ethereum Infrastructure

If Wang is the bridge between technology and community, then Tomasz Stanczak is more like the architect of Ethereum infrastructure. He is the founder of Nethermind, an execution client that has become an indispensable part of the Ethereum network.

In 2017, Nethermind was just a small project in Poland, where Stanczak and a few friends coded in a small apartment in Warsaw, trying to create an efficient Ethereum client.

Years later, he developed Nethermind into a core technical force within the Ethereum network, supporting its stable operation. His vision extends beyond client development, delving into areas such as MEV and PBS (proposer-builder separation). As an early member of Flashbots, he contributed important ideas for Ethereum's decentralization and security, such as optimizing block proposal mechanisms to reduce the centralization risks for miners.

At Devcon SEA in 2024, Stanczak stood on stage sharing his visions for the intersection of Ethereum and AI applications. Now, as a co-executive director of EF, he is responsible for ecological growth and safeguarding core values. His engineering background and strategic vision have given the community new expectations for Ethereum's technical future.

Danny Ryan Announces Return to the Ecosystem, a Long-Awaited Move

Following the announcement of personnel changes, the community's response surged. On Twitter, some praised Wang and Stanczak's technical backgrounds, viewing this as a signal for Ethereum's return to a technical focus; others questioned on Reddit whether merely changing personnel could resolve deeper issues. Vitalik also publicly supported this transition, calling it “part of a planned strategy.”

At the same time, the well-known former EF researcher Danny Ryan expressed positive affirmation of this personnel change and announced his return to the Ethereum ecosystem as a co-founder of the Ethereum ecological agency-level marketing and product department Etherealize. The community believes that Danny Ryan's return may guide Ethereum toward a more mature development path.

Interestingly, in an informal community vote on Ether in January of this year, Danny Ryan was selected as the best candidate to serve as the sole leader of EF.

Still Unavoidable: “Too Centralized”?

The leadership change at EF did not come out of nowhere but is an inevitable result of community dissatisfaction, market competition, and technological bottlenecks.

In 2024, Ethereum faces both internal and external challenges: Solana's low-cost, high-efficiency “Meme Paradise” is attracting massive market funds and attention, while Ethereum's high gas fees and congestion issues remain unresolved, leading to mediocre performance in ETH prices under layered comparisons. A deeper contradiction lies in the governance model. EF's decision-making power has long been concentrated in a few individuals, and this structure appears clumsy in the face of the current market's rapid iteration demands.

The community discussions have been exceptionally intense, directing criticism at EF, claiming that under Aya's leadership, it has been too passive and failed to respond quickly to competitive pressures. Some have even directly attacked Aya, stating that her overly idealistic ideas do not match the market demands at the time, with comments like “Why not eat meat porridge?” and “Ruined Ethereum's golden age” emerging frequently.

However, this position change does not seem to have truly resolved the issue of “centralization” at the upper levels of EF. After all, Vitalik mentioned that as early as a year ago, Aya had proactively proposed the idea of transitioning to the Chair position, and previously, Vitalik had clearly stated during discussions with the community that the decision-making power regarding changes at the upper levels of EF still belongs to him.

Therefore, this personnel change appears to be a response to community issues, but perhaps fundamentally it remains an execution of centralized decision-making.

The Market Only Sees Real Results; Ethereum Needs to Find Balance

Clearly, with Wang and Stanczak's appointments, the community both hopes for substantial changes from the new leadership and worries that this is merely superficial work under centralization. The intertwining of expectations and doubts has created a complex atmosphere at the beginning of this transformation. Perhaps the community's interest in the new officials is just a temporary novelty; transparent fund allocation and specific reform measures are what the community truly longs to see. In the coming months, every decision made by the new leadership will be scrutinized.

Facing the need for transformation in Ethereum, different perspectives will inevitably lead to different ideas. The Foundation's upper management wants to build a more idealistic ecosystem and future, but dreams always need bread to support them. The crypto market is no longer a space where Ethereum has the final say. If EF continues to sell coins indiscriminately and talks grandly about building while ignoring the community's real feelings, it will undoubtedly deepen the market's skepticism about Ethereum's so-called “decentralization.”

At this current juncture, we cannot predict the outcome. But one thing is certain: surface-level efforts and grand narratives can no longer support the true future of Ethereum. Rather than letting the community and holders oscillate between forced construction and helpless cursing, it is better for Ethereum's upper management, such as EF, to seek a true balance between decentralized development and centralized decision-making.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。