Fengmi believes that the core secret to grabbing airdrops lies in "losing Gas."

Investment banks transitioning to Web3? Entering the space in 2017, discovering the airdrop track unexpectedly during the "DeFi Summer" in 2020? After four years of "grabbing wool," achieving multiple results in the tens of millions?

How did the "Airdrop Master" Fengmi @Kui_gas accomplish this? If you are also someone who "grabs wool," this article, "The Sunflower Manual," is a must-read—

Fengmi believes that the core secret to grabbing airdrops lies in "losing Gas," meaning, where is the Gas consumed? Breaking it down, it comes down to two points: 1. Does the consumed Gas increase weight? 2. Does the consumed Gas enhance the on-chain profile?

This is part of the "Friends of OKX" series of dialogue interviews, aimed at providing new users with learning references by exploring the stories, industry thoughts, and lessons learned from KOLs with different backgrounds. This issue's interviewer is Mercy @Mercy_okx, welcome everyone to follow along～

Article Overview:

Chapter 1: Entry Experience: How I Came to Grabbing Wool and Became an Expert

Chapter 2: Core Strategies for Grabbing Wool: How to Filter Quality Airdrop Projects

Chapter 3: The Future of Airdrops

Chapter 4: Advice for Newbies: How to Start Grabbing Wool from Scratch

Chapter 5: Suggestions for OKX

Chapter 1: Entry Experience: How I Came to Grabbing Wool and Became an Expert

1. What prompted you to enter the space? Why is "grabbing wool" a "gold mine"?

I have a background in finance, specializing in securities investment and management. I worked in traditional finance doing hedge trading and investment banking. I entered the cryptocurrency space in 2017 and discovered the airdrop track during the "DeFi Summer" in 2020.

Actually, I learned about BTC back in 2009 when it was worthless. I even mined it with a laptop when it first came out, but I didn't understand the technology well and had a low level of awareness at the time, so I missed out. I really started to participate seriously during the bull market in 2017, drawn in by the explosive growth. I wanted to make big money; that was my pure motivation back then. Gradually, I got into DeFi between 2018 and 2019, exploring protocols like MakerDAO, Compound, and Uniswap.

During the "DeFi Summer" of 2020, I realized that DeFi mining and grabbing airdrops could be combined, and the compound interest effect was very obvious!

The moment I truly recognized that "grabbing wool" was a viable strategy was during the token launches of Uni and Sushi. I found many protocols that I was optimistic about, including ENS and Paraswap. From that point on, I heavily invested in multiple accounts, and later, ENS and Paraswap launched airdrops. The single airdrop reward from ENS exceeded 100,000 RMB, and the single airdrop from PSP started at 10,000 USD. This was my first big prize in this track, validating that the path of making money through airdrops was feasible, like finding a gold mine.

2. Why did you want to create and initiate 33DAO? What was the initial motivation? What impact has it had on you since its establishment?

33DAO is a co-creation, co-building, and sharing DAO organization, and I am one of the initiators. It has been running for four years now, with 35 members distributed globally. We must hold meetings every week, and all members must participate. I roughly calculated that 33DAO has held no less than 200 weekly meetings over the past four years.

The initial motivation was simple—I wanted to gather a group of capable and idea-driven individuals together to form a community that could truly provide value through regular communication, in-depth discussions, and the collision of ideas. At the same time, we continuously output externally, such as tutorials, market insights, and Space discussions, to help partners grab airdrops more quickly and better understand Web3.

Regarding the impact of its establishment on myself, I feel there are three points: First, I think the most direct impact is that I have met a group of amazing people, and everyone has achieved significant results through this. These members encourage and influence each other, enhancing their understanding and ultimately monetizing it. I think this is a very good process.

For example, during the recent New Year period, there was a token related to Trump. Within just a few minutes of its release, a member shared a CA. Initially, everyone thought it was hacked, but through members analyzing data together, they confirmed the information was real. Then everyone quickly positioned themselves, and I remember the price was around 0.5-1 USD at that time. In about two days, it surged approximately 100x. In the end, many people achieved extremely significant results. Unfortunately, I was abroad and bought too little, which was a big regret! At the same time, I deeply understood the importance of small circles and how crucial it is to communicate with the right people.

Secondly, the existence of 33DAO forces me to continuously output. It means I have to keep researching and sharing insights. Many understandings are not innate but evolve through continuous learning, deep thinking, and discussions with community members. This mechanism of forcing oneself to grow has had a significant impact on me. For example, we used to focus on ARB, Strk, and many other projects, where everyone encouraged each other during the bear market, ultimately achieving very good results.

Finally, the accumulation of resources and connections. 33DAO gives us the opportunity to directly engage with top projects overseas. Many projects are discovered through the community's efforts in real-time. Through many project discussions, we gain broader perspectives, and the interactions among members strengthen the connections, allowing the underdogs to truly integrate into the Web3 ecosystem.

Chapter 2: Core Strategies for Grabbing Wool: How to Filter Quality Airdrop Projects

1. How do you filter quality airdrop projects? What indicators do you pay the most attention to? (e.g., team background, token economic model, community activity, etc.)

The indicators I focus on for quality projects include: track, financing background, ecological layout, team background, on-chain data, technological innovations, etc. Of course, there are also market capabilities, operational capabilities, and organizational capabilities. When filtering and analyzing projects, I personally focus on the odds and probabilities, as well as costs. I believe this is a very complex process, and each step is a practical methodology I have summarized over the years.

1. Classify tracks and focus on the mainstream: There are only a few major categories of tracks. After seeing enough, you can naturally distinguish them. First, go through the mainstream tracks to form a basic understanding, such as L1/L2, ZK DeFi, LSD, Restaking, BTCFi, Move language, etc. I generally rank the projects in the ecosystem and then analyze the odds and probabilities separately.

2. Look for highlights and protocol technological innovations: After reviewing a lot of content, I focus on what the core advantages of the project are. What differentiates it from competitors in the same track? If time allows, I can read the white paper and official documents, but initially, I suggest forming an understanding of the track so that when you see a project, you can quickly judge what it does before diving deeper. I was particularly impressed by Mavrick, which had a high APR on ZKSync and discovered a huge opportunity.

3. Pay attention to institutions and investors from multiple perspectives: Projects backed by institutions have higher credibility, especially star-level ones that are less likely to run away and are more likely to get listed on major exchanges, with a higher ceiling. Institutional financing + investor perspectives. Institutions have already helped filter, effectively eliminating ordinary projects and increasing the win rate. I personally like to keep an eye on institutions I favor, such as Hack VC.

Core idea: First, look at the track, quickly judge the positioning, then look at the project highlights, and finally check institutional investments to find the project's alpha. Analyze the project's market activity strategies, especially from the project team's perspective. Explore from multiple angles and dimensions.

I liken this process to a self-introduction during a real-life blind date: what do you do, what does your family do, do you have money, do you have a house, do you have a car, do you have a job, etc. In short, I need to be very clear about why I want to grab this project.

2. Project teams usually use technical means to identify witch attacks. How can you reasonably use a multi-account strategy without being identified as a "witch attack"?

This is a good question, and I will try to cover it as comprehensively as possible given the time constraints.

1. First, what is a witch attack: It refers to an individual or team creating a large number of accounts to manipulate the network and falsely allocate protocol resources, typically involving batch operations, programmatic operations, and bot operations.

2. What the project team thinks and does: The project team and ecosystem hope that real users participate in the network, and they want to reward real users. The project team will use on-chain data analysis, address association, behavior pattern detection, and other technical means to identify them. A typical example is Nansen's AI clustering analysis.

3. The essence of a witch: It is not that using multiple accounts automatically makes one a witch, but rather that generating a large number of unproductive garbage accounts and abusing the rules to obtain airdrops is what defines a witch. The core of the project team's investigation into witches is "de-scripting and de-batching."

4. To answer your question: How to reasonably use a multi-account strategy? My view is to create "premium accounts." A premium account means that each account has "independent + real" characteristics. Recently, there have been many classic cases like Pengu and Tia, where a single address had between 500-2000 USD. A premium account means a high-quality account, where each account has real user on-chain records, independent behavior, and reasonable on-chain asset distribution. Having multiple accounts is also a principle of risk diversification; multiple accounts ≠ witch. Using a multi-account strategy is simply a matter of broad coverage, where the returns from a single account may not be as high as the odds of returns from multiple accounts.

Specific practices:

Account Creation Stage - Basic Principles:

1. Ensure reasonable fund flow; from the start of account creation, strive for differentiation, including sources of funds.

2. Ensure reasonable fund flow; avoid concentrated inflows and outflows.

3. Randomize interaction times and amounts; avoid mechanical operations.

4. Multi-chain layout; real user traces make accounts appear more natural.

Account Nurturing and Interaction Stage:

1. Avoid batch operations; each account should have independent behavior.

2. Randomize interaction times and avoid assembly line operations, such as randomizing amounts during interactions, transaction sequences, and combining multiple protocols.

3. Multi-chain layout to make accounts appear more natural; strive for independent interaction paths.

4. Create high-quality user profiles and behaviors; hold different assets to increase account weight.

5. Participate in real activities to increase account weight, such as DAO voting, NFT minting, and DeFi staking.

6. Combine interactions and embedded interactions, integrating DeFi strategies, ensuring Gas consumption is focused.

7. How do you understand "premium accounts"?

A premium account means a high-quality account, where each account has real user on-chain records, independent behavior, and reasonable on-chain asset distribution. Of course, everyone has a different understanding of premium accounts. The addresses to which the project team distributes rewards also hope to be real and high-quality. Some are for equity-type NFTs of their own projects, while others focus on on-chain interaction profiles. The points of focus often include funds, activity levels, diversity, on-chain identity, loyalty, mainnet data (Gas consumption, time, transactions, active time), and NFT holdings, etc. The more real, the better.

Summary of focus points: wallet history, interaction behavior, fund flow, asset holdings (tokens, NFTs), balance retention, multi-chain activity, and some social bindings…

4. How to control the cost of grabbing wool? What optimization strategies do you have for interactions on high Gas fee chains (like Ethereum)?

5. Personally, I don't use many of the programmatic things like IP, ADS, etc., that many people mention. Mainly because I don't know how, I focus more on the on-chain profile formed by the Gas loss of the account itself.

6. The costs of interacting with my accounts are: capital costs and Gas costs.

7. Therefore, the core points I care about are where the Gas is consumed, either to increase weight or to enhance the on-chain profile. These two points are the most critical for targeting the airdrop perspective of the project team.

8. Specifically, the strategy is to maximize interactions through DeFi, arbitrage, trading, minting, or high-weight transactions of the project. The goal is to recover the Gas costs incurred while improving the account profile. This has a significant reflexivity; one must first learn to lose money and lose Gas.

9. Regarding high Gas fee chains (like Ethereum), what optimization strategies do you have for interactions? This depends on the situation. In the past few years, only the first year had high Gas fees; the subsequent years had much lower fees. For example, right now, with Gas at 1, it's a great time to polish new accounts since no one is paying attention. You can combine specific projects to interact with mainnet data.

10. Different projects have different interaction requirements. How do you adjust your strategy based on the characteristics of the project?

Different projects have varying requirements for airdrop interactions. Blindly referring to tutorials is not very meaningful at this stage. Everyone hopes to achieve precise interactions + minimal costs + maximum returns, which is extremely challenging. This uncertainty and reflexivity require long-term practice and tracking, and it's the most difficult aspect of this track.

1. My strategy has always been premium accounts + weighted interactions + calculating high input-output ratios + controlling risks. I use high-quality accounts to target high-quality protocols in a combined trading strategy. Different projects have different airdrop distribution logic; one cannot apply a one-size-fits-all approach but must layout strategically. My experience in grabbing wool is not simply about "winning by quantity," but about finding the correct interaction strategy that aligns with the project's expectations and fits my personality.

2. For example, in L1/L2, one must consider TVL, authenticity, prioritize native DApps, and diversity in combinations. Play the ecosystem from a real perspective.

• For DeFi protocols, the project team's perspective focuses on deep users, prioritizing rewards for those who provide liquidity and trade over the long term, such as deposit duration, amounts, LPs, etc. Analyze based on the on-chain data of individual protocols.

• For cross-chain bridges and staking types, it also depends on the protocol background. Staking types may focus on the TGE timing, security, track position, and input-output ratios.

EigenLayer and Babylon cases.

Additionally, interactions can also enhance the quality and weight of accounts. Here, I can explain my logic for participating in the Wormhole, with single account earnings exceeding 10,000 USD. Due to time constraints, if everyone wants to hear it, I can share more… I talked about it here but don't want to write it down.

Community-based projects: Encourage contributions, and if the project has NFT-related gameplay, one can focus on ecological NFTs and hold equity-type OG NFTs.

"Grabbing skillfully" is more important than "grabbing a lot," especially as the current market increasingly values real users. Therefore, precise interactions, reasonable fund allocation, and long-term account nurturing are the current focus. In the current airdrop track, it's not about the number of wallets but about research on the project, understanding the rules, and execution ability!

6. After many projects airdrop, people often choose to sell the tokens they receive. How do you judge the timing for selling?

I haven't done well in this regard; I currently hold a lot of altcoins. I'm the typical example of someone who grabs but doesn't sell. I think there are many reasons for this. On one hand, the market has changed; in the last cycle, holders became wealthy, but this round, holding leads to losses. I previously held OP and ARB for over a year. Some projects, after receiving them, went to stake and dropped 90%, turning big profits into small ones. There are many projects I haven't sold after airdrops, like EigenLayer. If I encounter a project that drops significantly, I just play dead and wait for it to go to zero, listing the initial price as the cost price to account for losses. I have always pursued relative value rather than absolute value.

After suffering many losses, based on my personal situation, I currently sell about 1/3 of the airdropped tokens after receiving them, and then judge based on the project and market conditions. Most of the projects I grab are VC tokens. The points I focus on are mainly the last round of valuation, market capitalization at launch, unlocking conditions, and most importantly, market conditions. We can't serve as a reference; the core reason for not wanting to sell is the emotional attachment developed from grabbing airdrops!

Chapter 3: The Future of Airdrops

1. What do you think about the emergence of platforms like Pump for meme launches, and what impact will this have on grabbing wool?

Platforms like Pump.fun for meme launches have lowered the threshold for token issuance. Anyone can issue tokens in seconds using a one-click issuance model and automatically create LPs. This is essentially an evolution of a new, extremely free asset issuance model. Its emergence represents a shift from early ICO and IEO models to airdrop models, evolving into the current self-issuance model. It lowers the barriers to token issuance while also changing the mindset and strategies of Web3 participants (especially those grabbing wool).

1. Impact on project token distribution: This free asset issuance model lowers the barriers to token issuance. One-click issuance + automatic LP creation requires no technology or financing, allowing direct market entry. This new model not only affects the meme track but also changes the way traditional Web3 projects distribute tokens. Many projects will choose not to go to exchanges first but to launch directly on DEXs. Project teams no longer need to rely on traditional financing or token lock-ups but let the market determine the value of the tokens.

2. Impact on wool grabbers:

• Impact 1 - Mindset: The wool grabbing cycle has been drastically shortened, posing a huge test of human nature. Speculative mindsets have intensified. In the past, grabbing airdrops involved interactions over 3-24 months, with long waits for TGE. Now, with Pump's meme coins, one can see a hundredfold increase in minutes, but it can also drop to zero in minutes. In contrast, the time spent grabbing wool has uncertain returns, and the various characteristics of counter-grabbing make it far less appealing than memes.

• Impact 2 - Interests: The "belief system" of wool grabbers has collapsed, and speculative gameplay has been infinitely amplified. In the past, grabbing airdrops emphasized interaction depth, on-chain contributions, technical characteristics, and value. Wool grabbers hoped for long-term development from project teams. In the meme model, the core driving force of tokens is "emotion + narrative + funding FOMO." Many wool grabbers no longer focus on airdrops but shift to memes, caring less about the project itself and more about short-term fluctuations because it's more exciting, faster, and has a wealth effect. Everyone hopes to be the next big thing.

• Impact 3 - Gambling mentality: The mindset of wool grabbers has become more FOMO, easily falling into gambling tendencies. Traditional wool grabbing emphasized steady progress, but the meme ecosystem has pushed the market into an extreme speculative mode, increasing gambling tendencies.

1. Future evolution trends of grabbing wool: Is there still an opportunity to lose Gas with multiple accounts?

I believe there is. One cannot get rich without multiple accounts; excessive returns are impossible. However, it is necessary to balance personal capital and account fund flow and allocation. Losing Gas with multiple accounts is possible, but one should not burn Gas. There is a distinction here; the future of grabbing wool will focus on "premium accounts." Real interactions + natural fund flow + long-term activity are the optimal strategies. Grabbing wool is no longer just about "volume," but about testing "strategy + execution + information asymmetry"! Those with strong execution can still build premium accounts and accumulate more premium accounts.

3. For some projects that require both Gas expenditure and social accounts for tasks, how should one handle this?

Some projects design activities with a dual screening mechanism, requiring both on-chain interactions (Kui Gas) and social interactions (Twitter, Discord, Galxe tasks, etc.). This model places higher demands on those losing Gas. If not handled well, one may invest excessive costs and time, ultimately leading to mismatched returns. My advice and strategy are:

1. First, determine whether the project is worth "both Kui Gas and social." Before that, one should have their own logical judgment and thinking, while also assessing whether the project aligns with their personality and formulating differentiated interaction strategies.

2. Here, distinguish between studios and individuals; the strategies should be different. As a super individual, I personally maintain a set of three accounts, all registered individually through early overseas mobile devices, and they have been nurtured over the long term. Within my personal capacity, I manage them on different computers. Maintaining three accounts requires occasional differentiated activity, and these accounts will also check for associations, activity levels, and account quality. Due to time constraints, I won't elaborate further; this is foundational work that must be done but doesn't require excessive demand.

3. For each premium account, one can configure three accounts, doing as many as one can manage. For example, 100 accounts.

4. Focus more on on-chain profiles and high-quality transactions, abandoning a large number of ineffective Web3 interaction tasks. Judging the activities designed by the project team is a key point.

5. Will TX be useful? What role does trading volume play in grabbing wool, and is it still effective?

As the project teams' screening standards and anti-witch mechanisms continue to upgrade, this simple and crude accounting method is no longer the best strategy. Currently, grabbing wool emphasizes "interaction quality + transaction authenticity." However, TX and trading volume need to be combined with "interaction depth." To put it inappropriately, if you visited the bank several times, the bank manager might recognize you and occasionally invite you for coffee. At this stage, merely depositing may not be enough; you need to be a VIP and a long-term customer purchasing their financial products.

5. What kind of innovative airdrop designs in the future can create a win-win situation for the community, project teams, and the entire ecosystem?

This topic is a bit broad. How to distribute airdrops is an art for project teams. If done poorly, it can lead to disaster. To put it simply:

1. Airdrops have been proven to be an important way for Web3 projects to achieve early growth and user acquisition. However, traditional airdrop models have significant issues, leading projects to distribute large amounts of tokens without attracting long-term users, resulting in a high proportion of low-quality users and damaging the token economic model.

2. A good airdrop is designed to attract new users, reward early users, and retain more users, while also driving growth around the project's and ecosystem's economic flywheel. More innovative, fair, and sustainable airdrop designs should achieve a "triple win" for project teams, community users, and the ecosystem.

Future airdrop models and methods must adhere to the following core principles:

1. Long-term incentive mechanisms (to avoid short-term selling, encourage users to continue interacting, and contribute over the long term).

2. Combine on-chain data and off-chain community contributions to filter real users and genuinely contributing users.

3. Align interests among three parties (user growth = ecosystem growth).

4. Transparency (clearly explain each rule and its rationale), avoiding insider trading.

There are various specific methods. For example, a "gradual release" mechanism, referencing OP's airdrop, involves multiple rounds of airdrops, providing broad and continuous rewards for long-term contributions. On this basis, more elements can be added, and the airdrop strategy and design can be further refined. There is no perfect solution; we can only try to accommodate small and medium retail investors and more real users.

Chapter 4: Advice for Newbies

1. How to start grabbing wool from scratch? For newbies just starting with grabbing wool, with a capital amount of perhaps a few hundred USDT, how should they begin?

Grabbing wool is a low-cost entry path and strategy into Web3 that can earn some profits, but it is not simply a free money game; it should be a combination of cognition, strategy, and execution. Different people have different interaction strategies and methods at different stages, and there are distinctions between those with technical backgrounds and those without. For newcomers who are just starting and lack technical skills, my advice is:

1. Philosophical Aspect (Cognitive Level): Correct Understanding

• Learning: Understand some ways to make money in the industry, the models of airdrops, and explore ecosystems and protocols. Initially, look for points that have suitable projects for yourself.

Principle: After forming your own project judgment, clarify that not all projects are worth grabbing. Before grabbing, you should have selection criteria. The essence of grabbing wool is "low-cost investment." Time, Gas fees, and opportunity costs are all your "investments," so don't FOMO.

• Direction: Choose the right track; direction is more important than effort. When grabbing wool, select tracks with strong future certainty, large capital, and potential long-term incentives.

• Research: Build a project database, learn to evaluate projects, follow projects, calculate ROI, assess risk points, odds, weight points, etc.

1. Technical Aspect (Execution Level): Specific Methods

• Learn Correct Interactions: For example, how to swap, bridge funds, find tokens, and complete project tasks using a three-piece set. The core is to improve interaction skills.

• Increase Account Weight: Learn to engage in deep interactions and become an active, genuine, high-quality user of ecosystem protocols.

• Control Costs: There are many ways to grab wool, not just through Kui Gas; there are also very high-quality testnet projects in the market.

• Participate from Multiple Angles: For example, from a user perspective, deeply engage in the ecosystem; from a creator perspective, help projects write content, etc.

Summary: Start slow to go fast, and win with less.

2. Common Misconceptions?

Fengmi: Suffering losses can be a blessing; some pitfalls must be experienced personally. Self-reflection is the most useful. Teaching people won't work; experiences teach people once.

3. How should newcomers obtain quality information sources? What recommended information channels or tools do you have?

A simple way is to follow quality KOLs on Twitter, YouTube, etc. You can find projects from RootData @RootDataCrypto, along with corresponding X accounts and team members, as well as funding situations.

For learning, OKX's Web3 wallet @OKXWeb3_CN also has many basic project tasks that can serve as practice.

Chapter 5: Suggestions for OKX

1. What role and influence has OKX played in the development of various ecosystems?

OKX supports a wide range of ecosystems and chains; as far as I know, it currently supports 127 chains. Personally, I use OKX as my common wallet in interactions, generally sharing the same mnemonic phrase with MetaMask.

Features: Safe, timely, smooth—too many to list, but it works well. The Movement ecosystem greatly benefited from the support of the OKX Web3 wallet. At that time, Movement needed to download another wallet, but it was not user-friendly. After I reported this issue to Haiteng @Haiteng_okx, he quickly connected me with relevant colleagues, and support for Movement was rapidly provided, which made things much easier for us, eliminating the need to migrate assets back and forth.

2. In future developments, which ecosystems would you like to see OKX collaborate with? In what form? What kind of cooperation does the community want to see?

The ecosystem coverage is very comprehensive. As far as I know, the OKX wallet team is very capable, with strong BD expansion and rapid support, and bugs are resolved promptly. I think there may be room for optimization in the area of airdrop interactions. OKX @okxchinese has done well in breadth, but depth is lacking. Many users utilize OKX, so there could be a valuable growth system built around users' wallet situations. This system could collaborate with many ecosystems to help both sides drive traffic or provide OKX wallet users with more data boosts and rewards.

The tools already developed are excellent, such as the recent support for real-time candlesticks and one-click token trading on X. In terms of airdrops, OKX could create an airdrop detector, allowing users to check their wallets on-chain for any unclaimed airdrops.

Conclusion:

Fengmi: My experiences over the past five years have strengthened my belief: true value lies not in what you know, but in what you can connect and execute.

In this ever-changing market, the strongest competitive edge is a continuously evolving understanding, forward-looking layout, and strong execution ability. Time is short; please correct me if I say anything wrong!

Mercy: I first heard of Fengmi as a seemingly legendary figure, with some saying that Feng spent 365 days a year sitting in a temple grabbing airdrops… After truly interacting, I found that both his sincere and humble demeanor and his focused and dedicated work ethic are worthy of learning from and respecting.

In this dialogue with OKX friends about the "philosophy and techniques" of airdrops, Mercy gained three core points:

1. Excellent judgment is essential—"grabbing skillfully" is more important than "grabbing a lot";

2. A strong sense of responsibility—take every deal seriously;

3. Strong execution ability—needed by both newcomers and veterans.

I hope everyone can gain something from this. Finally, thanks again to Fengmi @Kui_gas for sharing, and I welcome everyone to continue following the "OKX Friends" dialogue series.

Risk Warning and Disclaimer

This article is for reference only. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not represent the position of OKX. This article does not intend to provide (i) investment advice or recommendations; (ii) offers or solicitations to buy, sell, or hold digital assets; (iii) financial, accounting, legal, or tax advice. We do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of such information. Holding digital assets (including stablecoins and NFTs) involves high risks and may fluctuate significantly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you based on your financial situation. Please consult your legal/tax/investment professionals regarding your specific circumstances. You are responsible for understanding and complying with applicable local laws and regulations.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。