Author: Kaori & Penny

On January 21, Ethereum's prominent core developer Eric Conner announced on social media that he was stepping down from the Ethereum Foundation, citing a series of issues including lack of transparency, disconnection from the community, and resistance to change within the foundation.

The criticism of the Ethereum Foundation (EF) has been ongoing for a long time. In recent months, the weak performance of Ethereum has further fueled dissatisfaction within the community. Many well-known investors and developers have expressed their opinions and discontent with the EF. However, the departure of a veteran developer indicates that internal divisions within the EF have reached an irreconcilable point, pushing the EF into the spotlight.

As public opinion continues to escalate and community anger remains unresolved, a grassroots initiative has quietly established the Second Foundation.

Ethereum is facing both internal and external challenges and urgently needs reform.

Who is Eric?

Eric Conner, a well-known core developer of Ethereum, left the ecosystem community after nearly 11 years of collaboration, citing Vitalik's rejection of a leadership restructuring proposal.

Eric is a co-author of EIP-1559, a significant network change that altered the way Ethereum transaction fees operate. He has not been formally employed by Ethereum but has consistently provided consulting and investment, and he has been one of the leaders in the ecosystem's development since its early days.

On January 21, Ethereum core developer Eric Conner posted on social media, "I am no longer '.eth'. Perhaps one day, those in leadership roles will realign with the community, but for now, I am stepping away. Deep down, I sincerely hope Ethereum succeeds. Good luck."

He later posted about why he joined Ethereum and why he chose to leave. Eric first encountered Bitcoin in 2012, and after the Mt. Gox incident, he witnessed many friends suffer significant losses due to reliance on centralized exchanges. Eric and a few friends attempted to develop the first decentralized exchange (DEX) on Ethereum—EtherEx. Although the project failed due to untimely circumstances, it allowed him to integrate into the Ethereum community.

Previously, Eric had stated that the lack of transparency and disconnection from the community within the Ethereum Foundation (EF) had become increasingly pronounced. The foundation could have cut its budget by 80%, allowing Ethereum to operate and develop normally. The problem is that the current foundation does not report to stakeholders, is gradually sinking into a quagmire, and resists change. The foundation currently exhibits an "anti-victory and competitive mindset," leading many community members to question whether they should continue to stay.

A frozen three feet is not a day's cold

Since last year's Black Mountain EDCON, dissatisfaction with the Ethereum Foundation has begun to manifest in the industry. Layer 2 (L2), as a solution to enhance Ethereum's scalability, has been shackled with the "Ethereum alignment" from day one, accepting and executing the EF's will. Everyone is pledging loyalty to Ethereum, aiming to be the most EVM-compatible L2, which has led project teams to focus more on gaining EF recognition than on the products and technologies themselves, causing the Ethereum ecosystem to begin to deform under EF's pressure.

The complex web of interests within the EF, the foundation's constraints on projects regarding ideological "orthodoxy," and the gradual exodus of major protocols from Ethereum have seemingly led the organization into a midlife crisis, struggling with structure, efficiency, and culture. With the meme trend driving Solana's resurgence, Ethereum's weak performance during several Bitcoin breakthroughs, and Trump's recent issuance of tokens on Solana pushing SOL to new highs, Ethereum's decline has become evident, allowing community dissatisfaction to gradually ferment. Under public pressure, on the 18th, Vitalik himself responded directly to the criticisms, stating that a large-scale reform of the EF leadership structure is underway, along with specific goals for the changes.

A stone stirs up a thousand waves, and a campaign against the EF follows.

On the 20th, Kain Warwick, founder of Synthetix and Infinex, was the first to express dissatisfaction with L2: "If I were to run the EF, I would definitely pressure Layer 2 to use sequencer revenue to burn ETH. Ethereum has a significant advantage in this negotiation…"

At the same time, Aave founder Stani Kulechov also stated that after reading the Ethereum 2024 budget report, he identified 12 areas for improvement to ensure the EF's sustainable development, including slowing down the burn rate, reducing staff numbers, and establishing a sustainable revenue model. However, on the 21st, Stani Kulechov posted again, stating, "I do not advocate for the dissolution of the EF, but rather for a better, faster, stronger, and broader EF path… We should focus less on internal politics or neutrality and more on advancing technological progress as quickly as possible."

That evening, Evgeny Gaevoy, founder and CEO of the top market-making firm Wintermute, also expressed his views on Ethereum, mentioning that Ethereum is currently at risk of falling into a "death spiral": "If there are no casinos, the only use for ETH is to send things in Zazulu, then the price will be very low, and security will also be very low. As the price of ETH falls, fewer and fewer dapps will consider it secure and will escape to other chains, which could form a very (deadly) spiral, further lowering the price."

Faced with the community's sudden backlash, the EF clearly was not prepared with a comprehensive strategy to quell the anger, even going against the tide by selling ETH in response to the community's staking suggestions. The next day, Vitalik announced an update on the Ethereum Foundation's finances, stating that the EF has established a new 3-of-5 multi-signature wallet, which will be used to participate in the DeFi ecosystem, and that test transactions have already been conducted on Aave.

However, the community seems unconvinced, mocking, "Are they preparing to sell again?" The EF's campaign against the community has not yet calmed, and the smoke of conflict still lingers.

Even the Second Foundation has been established, left or right?

On January 22, rumors circulated that Lido founder Konstantin Lomashuk had established the Ethereum Second Foundation. Currently, the official Twitter account of the Second Foundation (@2ndfoundation) has been launched, and Konstantin Lomashuk has promptly retweeted its first post.

On January 23, Lido founder Konstantin Lomashuk posted again, stating that this tweet was just an idea and that the "Second Foundation" has not actually been established.

He stated that Ethereum is the ultimate world computer, and every member of the Ethereum community can contribute to its growth, development, and success. If a second foundation is truly established in the future, it must have a clear goal to complement the significant work done by current contributors. "Thank you all for your support; I also believe that Ethereum needs more organizations to jointly promote development. I will share more ideas after further communication with those who contact me."

Although this plan has not yet been implemented, combined with Eric Conner's departure, the community has sparked intense debate over the internal and external challenges facing Ethereum.

Regardless of how the domestic and international communities debate, there is a consensus that the Ethereum Foundation needs to make a choice, as there is an inherent distinction between left and right; one cannot be both a leftist and a rightist. In times of industry difficulty, leftist idealism is needed, while rightist accelerationism is required during industry development. Some netizens commented, "If Ethereum takes the route of network nation-building, political diversity will inevitably exist. If multiple foundations can ensure competition and cooperation, it will guide Ethereum toward a greater future."

The Second Foundation currently appears to be a disruptive player, but some argue why not expect more decentralized organizations to have multiple departments to share power, just as Vitalik stated in an article on January 21 that the future of the Ethereum blockchain is decentralized, and the Ethereum Foundation is just one part of it. He further pointed out, "The EF should not 'over-intervene'; it should confidently represent the part of Ethereum that it can effectively represent while consciously creating and nurturing open spaces for other organizations to represent other aspects of Ethereum. Some of these aspects may even be more suitable for profit-oriented forms."

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。