A Brief Analysis of the Four Logics of Bottom-Fishing AI Agents

CN
PANews
Follow
6 hours ago

Author: Haotian

What? Does bottom fishing still need logic? That's right, for ordinary users entering the market, "bottom fishing logic" is very important. Because before the main wave of the "Spring of the Chain" truly arrives, high volatility will be the norm. Next, let's briefly discuss how AI Agents should go about bottom fishing.

1) Find leading projects with strong consensus

These types of projects have high market heat, often reacting the fastest during market surges and also having relatively strong support funds during downturns. The key is that they have withstood multiple fluctuations over time; if they can remain stable within a certain market cap range, large funds will generally favor these projects. Additionally, whether the entire sector has truly started depends on the performance of these large blue-chip projects, such as: $AIXBT, #ai16z, $arc, #Griffain, #Virtual, $GAME, etc.; @aixbt_agent

2) Look for projects with unique narratives and ongoing technological and application developments

Frameworks and standards have the highest ceilings, but the problem is that implementation is hard to grasp, and project technological progress can be slow. If there is capital manipulation behind the scenes, ordinary retail investors find it difficult to make clear judgments. However, some projects with clear developers and unique narratives are worth paying attention to, as these projects require long-term observation; short-term noise will be greater.

Because narratives need to evolve, each sub-narrative direction has a strongest Mindshare, such as: $Focai in the "chainification" sector, $BUZZ / $NEUR in the DeFi sector, $HYPER / $AVA in the Metaverse sector, $Dreams in the gaming sector, $SENTAI in the DePIN sector, and $SPORE in the creative gameplay sector, etc.

3) Find projects with relatively clear business logic and roadmaps

There are projects in the market that seem easy to understand at first glance but rely on operational data growth performance. Therefore, these projects often have weak expectations but stable fundamentals. If they can continuously show data growth performance and ongoing service upgrades, they are worth paying attention to.

For example: $FXN is creating a decentralized API sharing marketplace, $SNAI is a serverless AI Agent development and deployment platform, $YNE is a decentralized paper checking platform, and $WAVE is an AI automated trading agent one-click deployment platform, etc.

4) Look for projects that may have significant changes in commercial expectations in the future

I am quite optimistic about the future performance of the ai16z family of projects. After all, as strongly related projects under the large commercial IP of AI Agents, their development evolution has a certain narrative leading role, and there is a significant potential for change.

For example, the story of $METAV may not be over; once its narrative logic as an AI PumpFun is realized, the potential will be substantial. Similarly, if #DegenAI has outstanding performance after product delivery, the market cap difference with other similar products will quickly be filled, especially since it is backed by the family of projects. Another example is #Zerebro, which originally had a bright commercial path but has shown contrasting secondary trends.

That's all.

Of course, there are other investment-oriented bottom fishing logics, such as projects that are oversold, projects that have undergone sufficient wash trading, projects with healthy chip structures, projects supported by large communities, and old projects with a strong Mindshare ratio, etc.

The above shares several typical projects based on my personal filtering of the narrative development of AI Agents (not an exhaustive list; the comments section can supplement), for reference only and not as investment advice.

I hope everyone can sort out their own investment preference logic. In the direction of PVE value investment, the most feared mindset is purely PVP; once you lose understanding of the project's development evolution, it becomes easy to be influenced by short-term high volatility. Don't forget, most fundamentally strong projects may not perform as well in the short term as those with strong manipulation.

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

Share To
APP

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink