Why should AI framework standards move towards "chainization"?

CN
链捕手
Follow
1 year ago

Author: Haotian

Many people still do not understand why I have been calling for AI framework standard projects to move towards "chainization." Perhaps during the last two bull and bear markets, Chain infra carried too many expectations, and now that we have finally entered the AI Agent "application" era, there is a sense of dread towards "chain." However, for AI Agents to make more reliable autonomous decisions and collaborate with each other, they must inevitably trend towards "chainization."

Currently popular frameworks like ELIZA, ARC, and Swarms are basically still in the "concept stage." This stage cannot be falsified to zero, nor can it be verified to explode; it is essentially in a swaddling phase where valuation cannot be quantified. This is the first hurdle for issuing assets on GitHub; we need to find the feasibility of the outlined framework and vision to gain market consensus.

If we take a closer look at frameworks like ELIZA, ARC, and Swarms, whether they are optimizing the performance of a single AI Agent or creating multi-AI Agent interaction and collaboration frameworks, they fundamentally need to establish a traceable logic and rules for AGI large model API calls.

After all, the data is off-chain, the reasoning process is difficult to verify, the execution process is opaque, and the execution results are uncertain.

From a short-term perspective, TEE provides a low-cost, high-feasibility off-chain trustless solution that can accelerate the integration of AGI applications into the autonomous decision-making process of AI Agents. From a longer-term perspective, a set of "on-chain consensus" is also needed to assist in making it more reliable.

For example, if ELIZA wants to build an AI Agent autonomous private key custody solution based on its framework, it can use @PhalaNetwork's TEE secure remote authentication capability to ensure that the execution code of the AI-Pool is not tampered with before calling the private key for signing. However, this is just the first small step of TEE's application in the direction of AI Agents.

If we can place complex preset execution logic into the Agent Contract and have the Validators of the Phala chain participate in the verification, a chain of execution details based on consensus constraints of TEE will be established. At that time, the demand for TEE driven by AI Agents will create a positive feedback loop that empowers the chain.

The logic makes sense; TEE can ensure that private keys are not visible, but how the private keys are called, based on what preset rules, and how risk control emergency responses are triggered, etc. In the short term, transparency can be achieved through open-source code repositories, but in the long run, isn't it all reliant on a decentralized verification consensus for real-time validation?

Therefore, "chainization" can accelerate the AI Agent framework towards practical application and also bring new incremental opportunities alongside Crypto infra.

The direction is already very clear. For most people, finding and being bullish on the earliest chainized AI Agent frameworks and the oldest chains supporting AI Agents is the Alpha under the new trend of AI Agents.

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

Share To
APP

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink