Author: Haotian

@0xzerebro officially announced the release of the ZerePy framework and standards, and many people have shifted their attention to why there is no issuance of tokens for unknown cards, falling into a kind of fantasy of creating a new ELIZA community myth. This question is actually quite intriguing, so let’s discuss some thoughts:

1) For DAO organizations driven by ownerless AI Agent applications like ai16z, the ELIZA framework standard represents a sense of community cohesion and expectations for subsequent open-source ecological development.

The influence of ELIZA as a framework standard within the GitHub developer community is growing at a visibly rapid pace. It is endorsed as a community token by ai16z, while also gaining consistent market expectations. There are many incidental factors involved, and it is not the originally set development path. Therefore, how ai16z designs Tokenomics and clarifies the relationship between ai16z and ELIZA will be of utmost importance. However, how to integrate them still has variables that need further observation;

2) Here comes the question: subsequent projects like ARC, Swarms, etc., have all taken the route of first issuing tokens through GitHub repos (IGO). This novel MEME-based issuance method itself is a form of community financing, which is understandable.

However, whether the framework standard itself should issue tokens and how to empower after issuing tokens becomes crucial. Currently, under the market's FOMO sentiment, issuing tokens seems to have become a standard practice, but without a judgment standard, there will likely be a period where tokens are issued just for the sake of issuing, which is clearly undesirable;

3) The emergence of ZerePy serves as a model. Essentially, the relationship between ZerePy and Zerebro is similar to that between OP Stack and Optimism. It will share Zerebro's successful deployment experience in standalone AI applications in the form of an open-source foundational framework, allowing the market to see more standalone AI applications with Zerebro genes.

For Zerebro, this is a way to expand commercialization through open-source traffic and grow the ecosystem. Whether to issue a new framework token or authorize a MEME token is possible, but the specific choice depends on where Zerebro's market focus lies. Recklessly issuing a "split token" is not wise for an ambitious standalone AI.

Unless the ZerePy ecosystem develops to a certain extent and shows a trend towards platformization, and the old Zerebro's Tokenomics cannot accommodate ZerePy's incentive effectiveness, only then will the significance of issuing tokens become apparent. Until then, similar tokens can only be regarded as MEME.

Therefore, I believe that soon, the question of whether to issue tokens for the framework standard will evolve into an internal logic:

For frameworks that fully consider Tokenomics effectiveness, need to leverage platform effects, and focus on achieving chain operation, issuing tokens is a necessity. However, for ecosystems focused on standalone AI or other types of DAO organizations, whether the framework needs to issue tokens must be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.

Finally, a reminder to friends: the "asset issuance" method of first issuing on GitHub is indeed novel, but in the early stages, scams are bound to be rampant. Learning to discern the quality of GitHub repository code, analyzing the feasibility of its outlined commercialization application vision, and assessing the reliability of team members are all essential.

As for community MEME tokens being officially endorsed, ELIZA has set a precedent, but whether similar projects will exist in the future is fundamentally uncertain. Moreover, whether ELIZA can truly be empowered has become an unknown variable. Randomly seeing a framework standard and mindlessly buying in, relying on speculative fantasies, carries too much risk.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。