Blaming low birth rates on high tutoring fees is a purely erroneous attribution. In fact, both reflect the same issue: people are more competitive.

Why is that? It's not that East Asians are inherently more competitive, but rather that your economic development has led to this situation. Simply put, your economic model corresponds to a "small but elite" population distribution.

In the agricultural era, the demand for population was the more, the better. Why? Every parent was a landowner, so having more children meant more labor (workers). Why not have more? Anyone who doesn't is foolish.

However, in an industrial society, white-collar workers are actually part of the proletariat. When you have a child, you are creating value for someone else (the capitalists), which holds no value for you; it's a negative value.

So why have a child at all? You could just buy a little alcohol and watch web dramas, and the day would pass just like that.

So is there a solution? Of course, there is. The state can also be considered a capitalist, and capitalists need to help the proletariat balance the books.

If the capitalists (the state) are unwilling to spend the money to balance the books, it indicates that labor is not yet scarce enough to warrant that.

Wouldn't it be better to just get a couple of robots?

That's all there is to it.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。