In terms of the matter at hand, friends in the crypto circle should refer to "liquidity" more in the context of the US stock market and US Treasury bonds, at the very least the US stock market, rather than the so-called "smart money" in the crypto space. The scale is too small, and using crypto funds to measure the US macroeconomy may not be correct.

Taking a step back, if there really is manipulation, it wouldn't be in the crypto space, let alone the so-called "smart money." This is also why when it dropped below $61,000, I tweeted about the concept of trends.

In the face of trends, such minor fluctuations are not meaningful references. As of now, #BTC has returned to $62,000. If there is indeed manipulation, it is not at the minute or hourly level; the manipulation must be at the trend level.

This tweet is sponsored by @ApeXProtocolCN | Dex With ApeX

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。