⚡ $1.8 million purchase of $Eigen to compensate users | Puffer's feedback this time is textbook-level —

The issue arose because during the EIGEN token airdrop, inaccurate data provided by zkLink Nova led to problems in the distribution of tokens, resulting in some users not receiving the amount of tokens they were entitled to.

How did Puffer respond to this issue? Let's take a look at their entire actions:

It is advisable for some other projects to learn from this; truly putting the community and users first is the only way to sustain long-term success —

1⃣️ User Compensation:

Puffer directly spent $1.8 million in the secondary market to purchase Eigen Tokens and compensate the affected users. This is a very direct and clear remedial measure.

Such an approach is not common in large-scale decentralized projects, as the amounts involved are usually substantial, and there may be legal and compliance obstacles.

Puffer's actions demonstrate a high level of responsibility towards users.

2⃣️ Team Decision-Making and Transparency:

When faced with the problem, Puffer's team's first reaction was to solve the issue, and they tried various solutions, including direct OTC purchases through EigenLayer's official channels. However, due to compliance issues, this could not be realized, and they ultimately chose to purchase in the secondary market.

This transparency and persistence in problem-solving are commendable, especially in DeFi projects, where transparency is often the foundation for building trust.

3⃣️ Community and Responsibility:

The core reason for this approach may stem from Puffer founder AmirOnchain's statement, "I just want to do things right, I don't want to disappoint the community."

This is not just a statement about technology or finance; it is a commitment to community responsibility.

In DeFi projects, community support is indispensable, and this attitude helps maintain and enhance community trust.

4⃣️ Project Vision and Development:

Puffer has evolved from an initial staking project to now involving a broader range of technological applications and financial solutions. This development path showcases the team's foresight and drive for technological innovation.

The project's ability to attract support from institutions like Binance and Fidelity also reflects market recognition of its technology and vision.

5⃣️ Challenges and Criticism:

Puffer's performance in this incident can be seen as a positive case, demonstrating how projects in the DeFi space can respond to crises and maintain user trust through transparent and direct actions.

Although such incidents may impact the project's short-term reputation, in the long run, this responsible attitude may enhance confidence in the project among the community and investors.

From a personal perspective, it is gratifying to see this kind of feedback emerge. Such behavior may, to some extent, establish industry standards, indicating that when user assets are affected, project parties should take direct and effective compensation measures to maintain user trust and the credibility of the project itself.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。