However, if you compare "Developing Africa" and "Western Development," can you see any similarities?

Essentially, both involve the tilt of resources towards poor areas, with the primary benefit being strategic significance, while the economic benefits are in the distant future, with immediate investment.

This kind of investment comes at the expense of the people's livelihood in the home country or affluent provinces. Don't talk about foreign exchange reserves and domestic accounts separately, they are actually one and the same. If you exchange foreign exchange reserves for RMB, the RMB appreciates, and the income of domestic residents relatively increases.

I used to not understand the domestic payment transfer, but now I think I can understand it. China needs to exist as a vast country, so regional differences cannot be too great, and the population cannot all gather on the coast, otherwise the border areas are very likely to not be Chinese.

But investment in Africa is a different matter.

In plain terms, empires will always have disputes between isolationism and expansionism. I am an isolationist. Although I can understand the reasons for expansionism.

From a capital perspective, it is easier to understand.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。