Regarding the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate listing "virtual assets" trading as one of the money laundering methods

This is a judicial definition, and judicial definitions are traceable, which means that the interpretation is also applicable to transactions before the 20th. The judicial definition has laid a good foundation for courts at all levels.

Explaining judicial matters to everyone, but many people don't understand. Many lawyers have explained it, so I will explain it in plain language to everyone.

Criteria for identifying money laundering with virtual currency: It is clear that the transfer and conversion of criminal proceeds and their gains through "virtual asset" transactions and financial asset exchange methods can be identified as "concealing or disguising the source and nature of criminal proceeds and their gains in other ways" as stipulated in Article 191, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Criminal Law.

In simple terms: Your transactions must involve illicit funds, which represent funds from smuggling, corrupt officials, and other illicit activities.

Then someone asked: What should I do if I receive illicit funds from selling coins?

Answer: It depends on whether you are aware of it or not.

For example:

If I sell equipment on Steam and receive illicit funds. If I conduct normal price transactions and have records of buying and selling, I will definitely be investigated, but will I be arrested? Obviously not.

Subjectively, I am unaware. But if you sell USDT, originally selling at 7.2, and you sell at 7.25, the higher price is unreasonable. It is considered above the market price.

So it's actually the same as before, but the judicial definition allows the courts to define it better.

Money laundering is bad for both the coin circle and the industry. The stricter the crackdown, the better.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。