1. How much can Ethereum reach in this bull market?

It's awkward to answer this kind of question because it's just a guess based on historical data.

I don't know how high it can go.

I hope it can reach $10,000. But I think this price is also uncertain because so far, there hasn't been any breakout applications in the Ethereum ecosystem. Without breakout applications, it may be difficult for the price to rise significantly.

2. Is Binance leading the investment in UNISAT a big positive for Mingwen?

I think it's a positive, but not a very big one.

I'm becoming increasingly indifferent to news of large institutions leading investments.

What's truly impressive about UNISAT is that when very few people were paying attention to the Mingwen ecosystem, it took the lead in laying out its position in the Mingwen ecosystem and actually launched a series of practical products (although the user experience of these products still needs improvement). For example, if it weren't for its wallet, I might have participated in this ecosystem later.

If UNISAT can continue to make strides in this direction, with or without any investment, it can further establish its ecosystem and user base.

So, the real sustained and long-term positive for a project lies in the project itself, whether it is actively building, continuously innovating…

As for large institutional investments, at most, they are just icing on the cake and are unlikely to be a sustained, long-term positive for a project.

3. Don't mention the ecosystem. It's been 10 years in the currency circle. Which ecosystem has achieved the vision in the white paper?

In the currency circle for 10 years, Ethereum has always been moving towards the vision in the white paper, despite the distance still being far, the pace still faltering, and the process being very tortuous, with continuous controversies. But the forward progress has never stopped.

My confidence in it has never wavered, and I have never doubted its vision.

Of course, throwing a project like Ethereum into the vast crypto ecosystem, composed of thousands and countless projects, is like throwing a pebble into the boundless sea, where not even a splash can be seen—such projects are too few, so few that they can be ignored, so few that when we look around, most projects are just bystanders, struggling to survive, or even engaging in deceitful activities.

But this doesn't matter, it's a very normal phenomenon.

Looking back at human history, driving technological progress and historical processes has always been a few projects, a few companies, a few elites.

99.99% of the projects, companies, and beings that have appeared in the thousands of years of human history are just ordinary passersby, and they will hardly have any significant positive impact on history.

Despite this, it is precisely those very few projects, companies, and elites that have set the benchmark for all of humanity. They represent the heights that human civilization can reach, the brilliance that human wisdom can shine.

It is also because of the heights and brilliance created by predecessors that future generations can know the direction, see the light, and there will be a few new projects overturning life, new companies creating miracles, and new elites leading humanity forward.

Satoshi Nakamoto received the torch from the predecessors of cyberpunk, and Vitalik received the torch from Satoshi Nakamoto. It is precisely because of this relay that we can see the colorful crypto world today.

And precisely because projects like Bitcoin and Ethereum are very few, once we encounter them, we should dare to make relatively heavy bets within the risk range we can bear—this is what I repeatedly emphasize: Bitcoin and Ethereum should account for no less than 50% of our total allocation in crypto assets.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。