XRP v. Ethereum (ETH): Ripple CTO Clears up Major Sale Misconception

CN
U.today
Follow
3 hours ago

It is an argument that resurfaces time and again: why was Ethereum (ETH) allowed to evolve into what regulators now call a commodity, while XRP found itself in the crosshairs of the SEC?


Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer David Schwartz has once again stepped in to clarify one of the most misunderstood aspects of this debate: the way these two digital assets were originally sold.



Related
Thu, 03/13/2025 - 15:09 No, Ethereum (ETH) Is Not Dead, Says Top Analyst
Arman Shirinyan

HOT Stories XRP v. Ethereum (ETH): Ripple CTO Clears up Major Sale Misconception SHIB Burns Skyrocket 27,660% with 503,305,764 SHIB Gone Forever Bitcoin ETFs Go Back to Massive Outflows Dogecoin (DOGE) Death Cross Gets Worse: What to Expect?

Ethereum had a private sale before its blockchain even existed, but XRP took a different path, according to Ripple CTO Schwartz. He pointed out that ETH was distributed in exchange for Bitcoin during its initial sale phase, which raises the question of who its issuer was at the time.


ETH was privately sold by an issuer prior to any ledger or blockchain existing. XRP was not.

— David "JoelKatz" Schwartz (@JoelKatz) March 13, 2025

The SEC has always said that ETH, even though it was used to fund development at first, eventually became a commodity. But XRP and Ripple were sued, even though people in the know say it is used in the same way as Ethereum. 


And now, the SEC is still figuring out what to do with XRP, and they are looking at whether it is more like a commodity than a security.



Related
Thu, 03/13/2025 - 16:05 200,000,000 XRP Suddenly Leave Ripple into Unknown: What's Going On?
Gamza Khanzadaev

Schwartz is connected to the early days of Ethereum, which makes the discussion even more interesting. He participated in Ethereum's initial coin offering and got 40,000 ETH for just $0.10 per token.


But instead of holding onto it for the long term, he cashed out when ETH hit $1, choosing to reinvest that money into something tangible - solar panels, of all things. In hindsight, that decision seems almost as strategic as it was ironic.


免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

Share To
APP

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink