SEC Regrets Confusion Over ‘Crypto Asset Securities’ — Ripple and Coinbase Weigh In

CN
2天前

Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal commented on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)’s admission last week regarding its classification of tokens as securities.

In his remarks on social media platform X, Grewal highlighted Footnote 6 from the SEC’s amended complaint against crypto exchange Binance, where the securities regulator acknowledged causing confusion by labeling tokens as securities. He detailed:

‘The SEC regrets any confusion it may have invited’ by falsely and repeatedly stating that tokens themselves are securities.

Grewal added that he hopes Ripple’s chief legal officer, Stuart Alderoty, “is getting some good sleep tonight,” predicting: “His head’s about to explode when he wakes up and see this.”

SEC Regrets Confusion Over 'Crypto Asset Securities' — Ripple and Coinbase Respond

SEC’s footnote 6

The Coinbase legal chief further criticized the SEC’s inconsistent handling of Ethereum transactions compared to other crypto assets. He expressed frustration with the agency’s approach, stating: “That’s apparently for the SEC to know, and the rest of us to find out only if and when we are sued.”

He also pointed out the SEC’s previous claims that tokens, like XRP, are securities, saying it’s evident from their regulatory actions. This record, according to Grewal, contradicts the agency’s current stance, leading to confusion about its regulatory practices.

Responding to Grewal’s post, Alderoty wrote on X: “So the SEC finally admits that 1/ ‘crypto asset security’ is a made up term and 2/ to prove a ‘crypto asset security’ is an investment contract, the SEC needs evidence of a bundle of ‘contracts, expectations, and understandings’?” The Ripple legal chief remarked:

Ripple’s case is over, but the ‘fair notice’ defense is still alive for others. The SEC cites the 2017 DAO report as industry notice that ‘crypto asset securities’ are subject to US securities laws.

Alderoty criticized the agency’s approach, noting: “Seven years later, the SEC apologizes to a federal judge—surely a person of at least ‘ordinary intelligence’—for the confusion it invited by using the inherently unclear term.”

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

分享