😂 Many friends misunderstood my point. My view is that as an employee of the company, Sisi does not have the ability to represent the company in posting information on Twitter; it should be Binance that posts. What I want to say is that some media exaggerated the fact that Sisi prioritized posting information in the large investor group. I am not in any large investor group, and I have received Sisi's messages in 5 or 6 different groups. I don't think there is anything wrong with her posting in the group.

Many friends ask why she posted in the group instead of on Twitter. It's because she is not qualified to post this content directly on Twitter; only the person involved, @heyibinance, is qualified to post it. Sisi is just relaying the information. If Sisi had posted it, there would still be people criticizing her for not posting on Weibo or WeChat.

The ones who should be held accountable are several official accounts, not a single person. Moreover, I can understand that some friends have suffered losses, and some have missed the opportunity to buy the dip, which is frustrating. This is understandable, but the biggest problem right now is not about a Sisi telling you not to worry. Honestly, how many people would refrain from selling or dare to buy the dip just because of her words? Ultimately, people still need to wait for @heyibinance to personally speak before they dare to believe.

I just feel that it's pointless to criticize someone who poses no real threat. If you want to criticize, go after the instigator. Some media have exaggerated the so-called large investor group, but what I want to say is that it's not just the large investor group; many groups received the information. Maybe her actions did not meet your satisfaction, but this will only make her afraid to post in any group in the future, fearing being screenshot. Is that really what you want?

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。