Looking at the past and looking to the future: Why is it said that shorting has a low cost-performance ratio?

CN
PANews
Follow
1 year ago

1. Why is shorting not cost-effective?

In theory, shorting can earn a maximum of 1x, but it can potentially lose an infinite amount;

Looking back and looking forward: Why is shorting not cost-effective?

Going long can lose a maximum of 1x, but it can potentially earn an infinite amount.

Looking back and looking forward: Why is shorting not cost-effective?Looking back and looking forward: Why is shorting not cost-effective?

Although some argue that in the crypto space, all altcoins have strong gravitational pull (team selling), so shorting is not as bad as imagined.

However, I still rarely short (except for hedging), and the deeper reason is:

Shorting can distort one's perspective, leading to hatred for the industry (seeing the dark side can deepen self-doubt).

Once hatred takes over (which it will), losing faith, one day you will definitely start trying to short Bitcoin, but the consequences, you know, are terrifying.

You need to know:

Humanity's eternal money printing √

Bitcoin's eternal bull market √

-------- Divider --------

2. How much profit did the $Luna shorting army make?

In 2022, I criticized the Luna scam daily on Twitter, to the point where for a while, Luna's die-hard fans chased me down to insult me, so I have a say in this matter.

The collapse of $Luna essentially means:

The wealth of Luna bulls

↓ Transferred to ↓

Luna shorts + CEX.

After all, it was once a top 10 market cap project, so this wealth transfer was significant, leading to huge profits for the shorts.

But we cannot [only see the thief eating meat, not see the thief getting hit].

When Luna rose from $0.3 to $120, countless shorts' money had already entered the bulls' pockets, so shorting was still not worth it.

At that time, I made one of the few short trades; I didn't short Luna, but shorted $UST (Luna's stablecoin).

I still believe this was a pretty great decision; as a stablecoin, I started shorting at around 0.9, theoretically losing less than 10%, while potentially earning 90%.

However, such shorting opportunities come around only once every few years.

Looking back and looking forward: Why is shorting not cost-effective?

Moreover, every once in a while, you encounter something like $TRB, which can explode in place (no fundamentals, but goes from $10 to $550 in a few months), and even if you have god-level margin, it can wipe out all the shorts' ammunition in an instant.

Referencing what @dotyyds1234 said

Looking back and looking forward: Why is shorting not cost-effective?

So the conclusion is:

Do not habitually short (except for hedging)

Some money is better left unearned

In a bear market, it’s better to rest

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

Share To
APP

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink